Gidday folks,

I've been reading & trawling through the various posts and locked Golden Thread archives & I came across an interesting post from "Simmering Frog" which pointed out the discrepancy between the Government of the United States (corporation) from 1887 & the fact that the constitution was not ratified until 1788.



I've been reading a most truly excellent history on this American deception here:
The Modern History Project...
http://www.modernhistoryproject.org/mhp/ArticleDisplay.php?Article=FinalWarn02-1

Australia has the same problem. We were bankrupted in 1933 (33 years after Federation) & our financial overlords assigned receivers to register the "Commonwealth of Australia Corporation"... This company trades us (birth-certificate numbers) on the New York stock exchange and is a "NRE" (Non-Reporting Entity), with ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission ), which is a status given (for some bizarre reason), to international companies, who trade in Australia, whereby they don't have to report their accounting the way all Australian companies have to do.

Other companies in this category include Shell, BP, the Macquarie Group, the Carlyle Group etc... (you get the idea ?)

They basically do business in Australia but are really only answerable to International Maritime Law (Roman Law).
This law is simple. "You pay for the goods you receive, or else !" (The lies are complicated. The truth is simple.)

The "Commonwealth of Australia Corporation" gives it's "bond" to a small group of private businessmen known as the Federal Reserve (sound familiar). In return they print our money for a "small fee". But, they never print extra money for the "small fee", so consequently, each print-run, we have to pay a little extra back that doesn't actually exist. Obviously this gradually sucks the poor people dry as there simply isn't enough money in circulation to cover the debt. (Excellent quotes from Thomas Jefferson about this at the above mentioned web-site. The Modern History Project...)

In 1988 the Federal Reserve advised the government that they should legislate to "de-regulate" the banks (the Legislative Assembly had the power to set interest rates up until that point), & the Federal Reserve would take over "recommending" credit interest rates according to the state of the economy. Recommendations which the banks should follow.
We were told that this would create a much more competitive banking system from which consumers would benefit.
The Commonwealth of Australia Corporation, (being a good little subsidiary), obligingly passed the appropriate legislation & the banks could then do as they pleased.

3 to 4 years later the country was in recession and home owners were paying 18 % interest on housing loans. The great Australian Dream (to own a home), had caught cancer & was dying a slow death...

I was only 23 in 1988, but I can remember everyone saying how insane it was to give the banks this power & that NO ONE had voted anyone in on that platform. There was no mandate to do it. The politicians just went ahead and did it.

Most Aussies throughout the history of Social Security considered banks parasites on society equal to the "dol-bludgers" who didn't work and got money from Social Security whilst they were looking for work.

Social Security was un-Australian since it's inception (to help war-widows), & most people lived cheaply between jobs rather than have that "dol-bludger" stigma attached to them. Thus the Social Security was not a burden on tax-payers at all. Now: I have Indian friends (who work), that say in India, it is well known that Australia has "Centrelink" and you get money even if your not working. Apparently it is well known throughout the world. Everyone wanted to come here ! BTW: I think immigration is excellent, just as it was when it built America, but the un-Australianess of being a "dol-bludger" is gone and the young are happy to go straight onto these benefits, as they figure at least their parents paid for the benefits in Taxs & why should it go to the newcomers & not the locals...

THIS ratifies their Birth Certificate number & stock status in the Commonwealth of Australia Corporation, as they have to sign paperwork they don't fully understand & thus have accepted responsibility for their corporate entity of the same name as them.
(e.g: Fred Nerks the sovereign human being becomes responsible for FRED NERKS the corporate entity (on the birth certificate) owned by the Commonwealth of Australia Corporation.)

In CAPITOLS you become a legal entity under maritime law and that is why capitols are always used in court documents.
The Birth Certificate actually has a separate space below the "parents" entitled "Informants". This word "Informants" is used on court papers to describe who is making the court case. The parents, (or mothers) name/s is repeated in this lower section.

Hang-on !!! It was just a baby being born! What did a baby do that it had to be "Informed" upon to the courts ?
(Anyone familiar with Jordon Maxwells work will recognise this stuff. (Which, by me, is in an Australian context not American) Full credit to Jordan. He is a Hero of Humanity... Jordon will not sue the Golden Thread, he has publicly stated it's free knowledge & he wants the world to know.)


Well... The Baby was "Birthed" by the "Doc" and is considered goods unloaded from the "water" via the "Ship" (Informant), (that is the mother.) - (Ships are ALWAYS given female names.) The "Birth Certificate" is the "manifest" of the ship & the goods come under the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of Australia Corporation (as listed on the New York stock-exchange), who can then print money (debt) against the "goods", to pay for the goods. (To the International slave-master City of London / Lloyds of London / Rothschild Bank of England conglomerate...)

The trick is to get the sovereign entity (free-human) to accept the name in capitol letters (as in Bank accounts, legal documents), then you have him/her admitting to being an asset against which money (debt) can be printed... The parents aren't actually allowed to sell their children into slavery under maritime law...

No human is actually harming or enslaving another, and thus, it conforms to the most basic ancient law.
" 'An harm ye none do what ye will..."

For the first time EVER, Australia (22,495,929 people) has a 1 trillion dollar debt.
Thus each baby born is about a $ 44,450 AU part of that debt before they've even poohed their pants !!!

And that's modern human slavery in a nutshell. ( Help ! Help ! I'm stuck in a nut shell !)

It's the same for every Commonwealth country & although the United States tried, they did not escape this tyranny.

Not much has mattered until now that the noose grow tighter and the gillions of dollars that were never printed show themselves to be nowhere !!!

Regards Trex...