Evidence (of our foreknowledge):

A fireball [will] enter the atmosphere this year. You will not miss it. It will glow green. It will most assuredly be televised on every news network across the globe. ……We do not know the date of impact with Earth’s atmosphere, except that it will be this year. ….we cannot fully reveal that information in this message.

When the fireball enters Earth’s atmosphere, you must go inside and stay inside for no less than three days. You need three day’s supply of water, food and any medication you require, in your home. You need to make sure you do not need to leave your home for three days, for any reason. If it is imperative that [if] you leave your secure area, you must stay out of sunlight. This message is for the entire population, world wide. The air will be ok for the most part, but you need to stay inside for reasons we cannot disclose. There’s no reason to panic or be alarmed if you simply stay inside. Do NOT go outside for any reason. Do not open your doors. Keep them locked. Close the blinds. Keep a TV or radio on.

Within 12 months of the green meteor, four large portals will open in places equally separated across the globe….. We do not know the exact dates…. We do not know the exact locations… They will not be overtly reported by news networks (as portals…)

What we need you to do is stay away from these portals…

Signed,

“The Agency” (Yeah. Right).

http://www.examiner.com/exopolitics-in-seattle/rumors-of-alien-ufo-invasion-ufo-decloakings-multiply-as-do-forthcoming-alien-invasion-movies This is the first of an Examiner.com series of articles on an ‘Alien Invasion’ of Earth, whether a real or a staged false flag operation, and on ethical extraterrestrial/UFO ‘landings’.

(Aaron McCollum, preceded by Dan Burisch)

On the so-called 'soul vote', the 'point of no return', the evolution of humanity, etc....

Sorry for the delay, seems I'm running a couple pages behind, but sometimes I have to ponder a question for awhile before I can respond, and it's been a rather busy weekend.

You said, "But with respect to collective evolution, wouldn't you say that the human race failed... at some point in time... perhaps before or just after WWII?" I might be inclinded to agree with "just after WWII", but certainly not before. WWII was the last world-wide conflagration in which good and evil were much more clear-cut choices, despite the fact that the individual citizens of the nation-states constituting 'evil' forces were often themselves what could be called 'good'. The PTB of those nations making up the Axis exploited their entire nations in pursuit of evil and racist objectives, and the citizenry dutifully followed orders. On the other hand, the PTB of the Allied nations (those who came together to fight the tyrannical regimes and prevent them from achieving their evil objectives) early on were often supportive of the PTB in those very Axis regimes they subsequently pledged to fight. I'm talking about the likes of the Duke of Windsor (the one who abdicated as King of England so he could marry the American divorcee Wallace Simpson, who became the Duchess of Windsor), and George Bush ('Poppy' Bush), along with the Dulles brothers, who were eventually punished (lightly) over their breach of the Trading With The Enemy Act. Henry Ford, too, was an avid supporter of Hitler early on, as were many other American industrialists. Even Charles Lindbergh was a 'Nazi sympathizer'.

But to return to the issue; despite the cross-over of sympathies, the war was very stark in the differences between the Axis and the Allies, differences that had less to do with national interests than with overtly evil goals, and thus was a major demonstration of opportunity for conflict between "good and evil". Humanity 'evolved' markedly in those war years and the aftermath, and that probably played a huge role in the alleged 'soul-vote' that took place in 1946 as to the future orientation of Earth. Being that Earth is one of the "battleground" or "schoolyard" or "proving ground" or "soul garden" planets, a concept borne out in the generalized nature of our entertainment industry (Hollywood flicks, the 'stuff of which dreams are made of', are most often tales of conflict between good and evil when it gets right down to it), it's logical to think that indeed such a time would come that would allow for such a "soul vote" to take place in the life of such a world. Why wouldn't it be? How else, other than registering the sympathies (the 'vote' was an instant registration of every soul's proclivites as of that time) of the 'students' and determining whether they would graduate to a world is which indeed "all are one", cooperating with each other, or would prefer a world in which their 'self' would take pre-eminence and all else available would be subordinated to the desires of that 'self'.

This alleged 'soul vote' is what you refer to as that 'point of no return'; once that vote was taken, the Prime Directive law was allegedly (and logically; if told your side lost, and you're the kind whose side doesn't like being told they lost so you try to 'steal' an election) broken by the so-called "ST" ETs, who wanted as large a share of the soul harvest as they could get and subsequently 'broke in' and wooed Majestic with promises of salvation, wealth and power - beginning with their first 'invasion' at Cape Girardeau, Missouri in 1941, when it looked the darkest for the allies. That was when the human PTB first learned for a fact that there were Others in the Universe, and heard the first whisperings about the 'Big Event' coming. We also, as of the end of WWII, were rapidly becoming a technologically advanced civilization, thanks in large part to the accelerated R&D that comes from war funding. Sadly, our spiritual development lagged considerably, with organized religion using the same texts, the same rigidly-circumscribed paradigm, the same costumes, etc, as they had used for hundreds of years. Yes, it's true that the following decade (the 1950s) saw the growth of the 'contactee' movement and the many cults and splinter groups breaking off from organized religion, and the cultural explosion that occurred with the refinement of electricity a decade after that (fueled perhaps by the re-incarnation of the war dead into the bodies of the 'baby boom', bodies that subsequently grew up to challenge all manner of discrimination and pushed the envelope in all areas of the culture).

However, those many baby boomers went on to have children, some containing reincarnated souls and some simply awaiting situations involving moral dilemmas serious enough to spark a new soul. After Vietnam, which was nothing like WWII, children growing up in the suburbs of the West (that included western Europe as well as the US and its 'empire') faced very little in the way of physical challenges. Their challenges had more to do with abstract choices. Now we're about to be faced with a situation where all those abstract choices are going to come into play. The 'final test', prior to graduation, if you will.

One more thing, about the timing of the whole "soul vote", etc. One of the criteria in determining the timeline to transformation has much to do, in my mind, with the ability the child has in evolving to a point where he can master nuclear technology to a point where he can destroy or otherwise render uninhabitable a given world. We achieved that at the close of WWII with the dropping of two atomic bombs on Japan.

Isn't it chillingly coincidental that we reached the plateaus required for a 'soul vote', just ahead of the cosmically-immutable cyclical event known as a poleshift? Since then, we've mastered material technology to the point where we can implant a microchip in each of us that contains all the data necessary to control us via any sphere of life? Medically, socially, economically, intellectually, politically? Even, depending on how 'aware' we are, spiritually?

So all in all, I don't think we stopped evolving even just after WWII, we just stopped evolving in certain areas, and those for certain reasons, each connected to the foretold "Transformation".

Just my too sense in response, fulcanelli. I do appreciate your questions, and think they need to be asked by those who haven't come to any conclusions. Too often someone might feel too intimidated to ask, or don't feel they can ask something without employing ridicule, or they may even be so convinced of their existing paradigm that anything that conflicts with it shouldn't even be examined for any logic. This is why I always appeal to logic when I'm in a disagreement; "I've shown you mine [logic], now you show me yours". Unfortunately there's much more disagreement out there than there is logic for it.

I have discovered an excellent website filled with articles by Dave McGowan. It's called The Center for an Informed America (CIA).
http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/index.html

The combination of a large cranium and immature face would look decidedly unusual to modern eyes, but not entirely unfamiliar. Such faces peer out from the covers of countless science fiction books and are often attached to “alien abductors” in movies. The naturalist Loren Eiseley made exactly this point in a lyrical and chilling passage from his popular book, The Immense Journey, describing a Boskop fossil:



Boskops, then, were much talked and written about, by many of the most prominent figures in the fields of paleontology and anthropology.

Yet today, although Neanderthals and Homo erectus are widely known, Boskops are almost entirely forgotten.

...more at the link:
http://discovermagazine.com/2009/the-br ... er-than-us

Well, that subject reminded me of "The Wave" - spoken about by the Cassiopaeans

The Wave Chapter 1: Riding The Wave
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/wave_i.htm

..."All the fault lines closely watched on the West Coast will adjust, the volcanoes nervously watched will erupt, and certainly the waters off the coast will be choppy if not generating some minor tsunami during the plate adjustments.......The West Coast of the US is alert and guarded in this regard, as is Japan. They anticipate this type of activity, and will be alert to signs that a quake or eruption or tsunami is pending. Thus, we focus on the larger changes, and in warning those areas that will not receive such services from their governments..."

The fact that this was a snip from a segment that is said to have been "deleted" may have sparked the curiousity of someone like the chap that's narrating the clip, but the clip might also have been introduced to the collection 'just prior' to being marketed on DVD, (via photoshopping techniques). After all, how would anyone disprove that, especially on a clip that was supposedly deleted (but thanks to the efforts of blah, blah, blah) from the final published film…