mountaintiger7 wrote: ...... PTB ALLOWED/CAUSE THIS Quote: Flight 93 was downed, I do not believe it was for the reason commonly given (save the White House). I now believe, based on the collective phone calls, that there really was a “let’s roll” attempt to recover the cockpit, but with one difference: they were not retaking it from Muslim terrorists, but from Israeli special ops. Indications are that the passengers overwhelmed the terrorist guarding the cockpit and had begun breaching it. Remember, the flight attendants had a key of their own.
After subjecting myself to hundreds of hours of 9/11 videos on YouTube when I connected my Roku to my big screen TV and cut the cable cord, I can say this person has not done enough research on this aspect (the Flight 93/Shanksville hoax) though they are on the right track.
Several researchers have concluded that all the flights were diverted to Stewart AFB (a strange military facility that was once both an international airport and a real air-force base, now a national guard air-base), which was in such a state of limbo in 2001 that it was the perfect location for the flights to converge on and be replaced with drone craft i.e. aircraft that had been retrofitted to be operated by remote control, as outlined in both the publicly-aired "Lone Gunmen" X-Files spin-off show, and in the controversial JFK-era Operation Northwoods plan to attack Cuba. I myself went to Shanksville and witnessed first-hand the poor excuse for an aircraft impact that existed there prior to them building an "official" memorial that completely covered up the alleged "hole"......even though that was under construction when I went there with my friend, we weren't allowed to venture close enough to see first-hand the impact area. It was fenced off. The "tour guides" explained to my incredulous friend and myself how they had been bused to New York and DC to witness first-hand the "other 9/11 impact areas", were put up in nice hotels and given the royal treatment, which explained how they could so blithely sell the lies they proceeded to tell us about what happened in Shanksville that day. Even when we arrived, the uniformed guards came peeking out from the main entrance and stared at my friend and I as we pulled up and parked the car (there were plenty of other tourists); I surmise they'd been warned we would be appearing and might put up a scene, and indeed they kept us under their watchful eye as we went through the kabuki theater of bullsh*t....including the wall of memories where cards were offered to tourists to write something sappy and sentimental about the 'lost heroes' and then pin it on this massive wall of cork. The thing is, THERE WAS MINIMAL WRECKAGE......there were a few photos of the so-called 'debris' pasted on one wall, and what was so astonishing is how so many otherwise-intelligent people seemed to swallow the bull  whole! One piece of 'wreckage', which was the only piece larger than a bread-box, was a section of the fuselage centered on a window, and it was propped up/posed against a tree. The rest could've fit into the back of an F-150 Ford pick-up truck. I asked where the rest of the wreckage was, and the cheerleader-type 'tour guide' chirped that the impact was "so great the plane dissolved into the hole". To say I was incredulous would be an understatement, but my friend nudged me carefully and nodded at the security guards, who were staring intently at us from about 20 yards away. So I listened patiently and put myself through the ignominy of being lied to without responding, but I sensed the danger I/we were in.
The point is, it was clear to anyone with a modicum of intelligence that there had been NO plane impact; the claims of those "nearby" at the time are suspect, as we never know their names, and the only ones who can be named indicate they heard a helicopter shortly afterwards, coming to investigate (rather, coming to dump enough trash to give a vague resemblance of a crash site).
Like all the other perps of the Cover-up, he liars helping perpetuate this lie should be hauled out and horsewhipped to hell and back before being nurtured back to sanity when they can admit to the evil.
........
MountainTiger7 wrote: Quote: http://beforeitsnews.com/economy/2017/06/yes-virginia-there-really-were-hijackers-on-the-911-planes-but-not-the-ones-we-were-told-2899860.html?currentSplittedPage=0  Chris Bollyn, one of the best 9/11 researchers. After Chris completed his PowerPoint presentation, he took audience questions, and I asked his opinion of the “no planes” theory. Chris said that on images of Flight 175’s underside, there appears to be a “pod” or missile; its nose lights up when it meets the building. (This is much discussed in the 9/11 movement. Such a missile could not have been attached to Flight 175 without being noticed by Logan Airport maintenance crews.)
Not sure if this is your own take on it Tiger, or whether it's part of the quote from James Perloff, but again this misses an integral concept that's taken shape with ample logic to back it up: if the original planes were diverted to Stewart AFB, and military aircraft that had been fitted with remote control abilities and the necessary explosives to detonate just prior to impact took off in their stead, then any objections about "Logan Airport maintenance crews" becomes meaningless. Does anyone seriously think, upon examination of ALL the evidence, that the perps who planned the 9/11 scenario over YEARS would not have considered all aspects? Of course they would! Regarding any plane taking off from Logan (and I just happened to see, a short time ago, a video that inexorably demonstrated the "security cam footage" at Logan that allegedly caught Mohammed Atta in transit was bogus.....when pressed, "additional" footage was supposedly found, but that used technology that was NOT used in 2001); one could study the available technology of the time to discover that the cellphone technology could NOT allow for the claims made by the Establishment, and just as importantly the surveillance technology wasn't what we've been told either. Also and more obviously, any remote-control tech, any "pods", explosives, etc, would NOT be evident on the actual airliners at time of take-off from the civilian facility "Logan International Airport". And the passengers? Has anyone googled the passengers to see what kind of online 'footprint' they had? What about facts such as the mayor of Las Vegas going to the airport to console the waiting relatives of passengers that supposedly died in one of the four aircraft? NO-ONE was there, NO family members or friends had gone to the airport to greet/pick up their loved ones, and that would only occur (he went there very soon after reports came in about the flights) if indeed there were NO actual 'passengers'. Like crisis actors at Sandy Hook, Boston, etc.
|
We're still stuck in 2016 here at the GT......
hmmmm, yes!
