From: John Kooiman
Subject: TR-3B Antigravity Physics Explained:
To be correct, I probably should say, "TR-3B Antigravity Physics
Explained, insofar as General Relativity can be considered an
explanation for gravity."
Many readers of this list are probably already familiar with Edgart. If not,
read about it here:
http://fouchemedia.com/arap/speech.htm.
Mr. Fouche describes the TR-3B's propulsion system as follows:
"A circular, plasma filled accelerator ring called the Magnetic Field
Disrupter, surrounds the rotatable crew compartment and is far ahead
of any imaginable technology... The plasma, mercury based, is
pressurized at 250,000 atmospheres at a temperature of 150 degrees
Kelvin, and accelerated to 50,000 rpm to create a super-conductive
plasma with the resulting gravity disruption.
The MFD generates a magnetic vortex field, which disrupts or
neutralizes the effects of gravity on mass within proximity, by 89
percent...
The current MFD in the TR-3B causes the effect of making the vehicle
extremely light, and able to outperform and outmaneuver any craft yet
...My sources say the performance is limited only the stresses that
the human pilots can endure. Which is a lot, really, considering along
with the 89% reduction in mass, the G forces are also reduced by 89%.
The crew of the TR-3B should be able to comfortable take up to 40Gs...
Reduced by 89%, the occupants would feel about 4.2 Gs.
The TR-3Bs propulsion is provided by 3 multimode thrusters mounted at
each bottom corner of the triangular platform. The TR-3 is a sub-Mach
9 vehicle until it reaches altitudes above l20,000 feet - then who
knows how fast it can go!..."
I was skeptical of Mr. Fouche's claims when I first read them, as I'
m sure that many of you are, but I was interested enough to do further
research on what happens when you spin a plasma at high speeds in a
ring (toroidal) configuration. I came across a physics article (sorry,
I can't seem to locate the source right now) that described this
exact configuration. The article said that, surprisingly, the charged
particles of the plasma don't just spin uniformly around the ring,
but they tend to take up a synchronized, tightly pitched, helical
(screw thread) motion as they move around the ring. This can be
understood in a general way as follows: the charged particles moving
around the ring act as a current that in turn sets up a magnetic field
around the ring. It is a well-known fact that electrons (or ions) tend
to move in a helical fashion around magnetic field lines. Although it
is a highly complex interaction, it only requires a small leap of
faith to believe that the end result of these interactions between the
moving charged particles (current) and associated magnetic fields
results in the helical motion described above. In other words, the
charged particles end up moving in very much the same pattern as the
current on a wire tightly wound around a toroidal core.
I thought that this was an interesting fact, but didn't see how it
could possibly relate to antigravity, until I ran across the following
article: "Guidelines to Antigravity" by Dr. Robert Forward, written in
1962 (available at:
http://www.whidbey.com/forward/pdf/tp007.pdf). Dr. Forward's
article describes several little known aspects of Einstein's General
Relativity Theory that indicate how moving matter can create unusual
gravitational effects. When I saw Figure 5 in Dr. Forward's article,
the pieces of the puzzle all fell together. I instantly saw how the
moving matter pattern that Dr. Forward describes as necessary to
generate a gravitational dipole was exactly the same as the plasma
ring pattern described in the physics article discussed above!
If Fouche's description is even close to correct, then the TR-3B
utilizes this little known loophole in General Relativity Theory to
create it's antigravity effects! Even though the TR-3B can only
supposedly cancel 89% of gravity (and inertia) today, there is no
reason why the technology can't be improved to exceed 100% and
achieve true antigravity capability!
In theory, this same moving matter pattern could be mechanically
reproduced by mounting a bunch of small gyroscopes all around the
larger ring, with their axis on the larger ring, and then spinning
both the gyroscopes and the ring at high speeds. However, as Dr.
Forward points out any such mechanical system would probably fly apart
before any significant antigravity effects could be generated.
However, as Dr. Forward states, "By using electromagnetic forces to
contain rotating systems, it would be possible for the masses to reach
relativistic velocities; thus a comparatively small amount of matter,
if dense enough and moving fast enough, could produce usable
gravitational effects."
The requirement for a dense material moving at relativistic speeds
would explain the use of Mercury plasma (heavy ions). If the plasma
really spins at 50,000 RPM and the Mercury ions are also moving in a
tight pitched spiral, then the individual ions would be moving
probably hundreds, perhaps thousands of times faster than the bulk
plasma spin, in order to execute their "screw thread" motions. It is
quite conceivable that the ions could be accelerated to relativistic
speeds in this manner. I am guessing that you would probably want to
strip the free electrons from the plasma, making a positively charged
plasma, since the free electrons would tend to counter rotate and
reduce the efficiency of the antigravity device.
One of Einstein's postulates of GR says that gravitational mass and
inertial mass are equivalent. This is consistent with Mr. Fouche's
claim that inertial mass within the plasma ring is also reduced by
89%. This would also explain why the vehicle is triangular shaped.
Since it still requires conventional thrusters for propulsion, the
thrusters would need to be located outside of the "mass reduction
zone" or else the mass of the thruster's reaction material would also
be reduced, making them terribly inefficient. Since it requires a
minimum of 3 legs to have a stable stool, it follows that they would
need a minimum of 3 thrusters to have a stable aerospace platform.
Three thrusters, located outside of the plasma ring, plus appropriate
structural support, would naturally lead to a triangular shape for the
vehicle.
I was extremely skeptical of Mr. Fouche's claimed size for the TR-3B,
of 600 feet across. At first, I thought that this must be a typo. Why
would anyone in their right mind build a "Tactical Reconnaissance"
vehicle 2 football fields long? They must be nuts! However, the answer
to this may also be found in Dr. Forward's paper. As Dr. Forward's
puts it, "...even the most optimistic calculations indicate that very
large devices will be required to create usable gravitational forces.
Antigravity...like all modern sciences, will require special projects
involving large sums of money, men, and energy."
John Kooiman