It is currently Sat Jun 25, 2022 10:09 pm



Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 768 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 27, 28, 29, 30, 31
 The Golden Thread, Volume 3.8 2007 
Author Message
GT Truther
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:38 pm
Posts: 3178
Location: "Consulting the Oracles"
Post 
That's it..that's what bothers me about him too Starry.
Wishy-Washy.
I know more of Hillary and wish she'd been given a chance.
She knows the ropes the White House tries to pull and I think she'd put up a good fight before caving in to the name of National Security generally used as a clincher.
If it has to be a Republican...Good luck to McCain.

Dex


Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:55 pm
Profile WWW
GT Truther
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:24 am
Posts: 2179
Location: Los Altos California
Post 
Uncle John here: OK, I just awoke from a dream to see marci promoting this video of Hillary and Bill Clinton along with Phil from the Sopranos. Pam and I love the Sopranos and have just two episodes left to watch. Hey, we love Phil and Friends, also.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shKJk3Rph0E

Of course this is no spoof. There is a clear message here for those that can see and feel, for those that can pause (LOL), for those that know the hits (LOL) and for those that know the players.

I awoke from a dream to realize that the greatest catastrophe facing humanity is the awareness of the ET presence or "Smash Mouth" as Bill puts it. (LOL)

This will take away our current relationship to God and have a much bigger effect than reducing the human population to a few.

This is a lot more earth altering than having a nuclear bomb go off.

This would make 9/11 look like just a couple of building demolition's in comparison.

And who is prepared to guide us through this scenario? Oh what a dream!

Lyrics for: Brandy by the Looking Glass (1972)

There's a port on a western bay
And it serves a hundred ships a day
Lonely sailors pass the time away
And talk about their homes

And there's a girl in this harbor town
And she works layin' whiskey down
They say "Brandy, fetch another round"
She serves them whiskey and wine

The sailors say "Brandy, you're a fine girl" (you're a fine girl)
"What a good wife you would be" (such a fine girl)
"Yeah your eyes could steal a sailor from the sea"
(dooda-dit-dooda), (dit-dooda-dit-dooda-dit)

Brandy wears a braided chain
Made of finest silver from the North of Spain
A locket that bears the name
Of the man that Brandy loves

He came on a summer's day
Bringin' gifts from far away
But he made it clear he couldn't stay
No harbor was his home

The sailor said " Brandy, you're a fine girl" (you're a fine girl)
"What a good wife you would be" (such a fine girl)
"But my life, my love and my lady is the sea"
(dooda-dit-dooda), (dit-dooda-dit-dooda-dit)

Yeah, Brandy used to watch his eyes
When he told his sailor stories
She could feel the ocean fall and rise
She saw its ragin' glory
But he had always told the truth, Lord, he was an honest man
And Brandy does her best to understand
(dooda-dit-dooda), (dit-dooda-dit-dooda-dit)

At night when the bars close down
Brandy walks through a silent town
And loves a man who's not around
She still can hear him say
She hears him say
"Brandy, you're a fine girl" (you're a fine girl)
"What a good wife you would be" (such a fine girl)
"But my life, my love and my lady is the sea"
(dooda-dit-dooda), (dit-dooda-dit-dooda-dit)

"Brandy, you're a fine girl" (you're a fine girl)
"What a good wife you would be" (such a fine girl)
"But my life, my love and my lady is the sea"

(dooda-dit-dooda), (dit-dooda-dit-dooda)

UJ: I just realized the inside joke in planet X.

I'm a Mathematician so I'm well schooled in the uses of the variable X.

I'm a Dead Head so I'm well schooled in the uses of the variable X.

If humanity was introduce to another planet, say planet X, what would be the consequences?

Are we having fun yet?

Now let us take X to the infinite power.

Follow my logic? Follow the news? Follow the shows?

Hey, perhaps those fema camps are not for sentient beings called humans?

Welcome to the underground.

ROTFLMAO.

I also got that focus on the positive and parallel parking inside jokes.

I love a parade.

Only love can fill.


Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:03 am
Profile WWW
GT Truther
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:46 am
Posts: 2830
Location: Miles from DC in rural PA
Post ANOTHER STOLEN ELECTION
shane wrote:
A whole jumbo sized portion of information pertaining to psychopaths. Low fat and lightly seasoned for your enjoyment.

Take your pick...one from column A, two from column B.

http://www.cassiopaea.com/cassiopaea/psychopath3.htm


Not sure what the reference meant re "....one from column A" etc....

Unless you were making a sardonic comment on the presidential 'race'?

In which case one can make the argument that many presidential candidates (and subsequently presidents) are psychopathic, if not one of the "3% of men, 1% of women" that are official psycopaths.

I was still in a state of shock up until a few minutes ago; I watched all the MSM pundits 'eating crow' about the election, and then a friend reminded me of that old nemesis of democracy: DIEBOLD. WHere else does a candidate turn a 13-point deficit into a 2-point lead overnight? When DIEBOLD machines are programmed to steal the election, such as in Ohio and Florida in Nov 2000 and 2004.

In every jurisdiction I highlighted below, the HAND COUNTED BALLOTS reflected the actual tracking polls and exit polls. Even some of the DIEBOLD COUNTED BALLOTS did as well (they wouldn't be that stupid as to rig ALL of the machines, now would they?). In every highlighted jurisdiction where DIEBOLD the ballots, the results were upended, in a few cases majorly. Why? They calculated what they needed to steal to give Hillary an 'edge' of 3% on average (count 'em!). In some cases, the DIEBOLD totals reflected EXACTLY the 'winning' (sic) margin. There are, as I mention following the tables, the obvious areas where Hillary won the hand count, or Obama was allowed to win the machine count, or one jurisdiction where Edwards handily won a hand count. But overall, see the percentage of jurisdicitons highlighted, and come to your own conclusions.

I smell (or read) a RAT.

TAKE A LOOK AT THE FOLLOWING RESULTS:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Complete Vote Breakdown By Town & Candidate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Albany - 194 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 58 votes = 29.90%
- Edwards = 34 votes = 17.53%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 5 votes = 2.58%
- Obama = 82 votes = 42.27%
- Richardson = 13 votes = 6.70%
- Other = 2 votes = 1.03%


Alexandria - 348 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 118 votes = 33.91%
- Edwards = 83 votes = 23.85%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.29%
- Kucinich = 5 votes = 1.44%
- Obama = 121 votes = 34.77%
- Richardson = 15 votes = 4.31%
- Other = 5 votes = 1.44%


Allenstown - 990 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 461 votes = 46.57%
- Edwards = 212 votes = 21.41%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 4 votes = 0.40%
- Obama = 256 votes = 25.86%
- Richardson = 50 votes = 5.05%
- Other = 7 votes = 0.71%


Alstead - 515 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 147 votes = 28.54%
- Edwards = 66 votes = 12.82%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 29 votes = 5.63%
- Obama = 240 votes = 46.60%
- Richardson = 31 votes = 6.02%
- Other = 2 votes = 0.39%


Alton - 979 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 362 votes = 36.98%
- Edwards = 189 votes = 19.31%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.10%
- Kucinich = 10 votes = 1.02%
- Obama = 371 votes = 37.90%
- Richardson = 36 votes = 3.68%
- Other = 10 votes = 1.02%


Amherst - 2,911 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 970 votes = 33.32%
- Edwards = 424 votes = 14.57%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.03%
- Kucinich = 31 votes = 1.06%
- Obama = 1309 votes = 44.97%
- Richardson = 155 votes = 5.32%
- Other = 21 votes = 0.72%


Andover - 620 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 192 votes = 30.97%

- Edwards = 96 votes = 15.48%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 17 votes = 2.74%
- Obama = 270 votes = 43.55%
- Richardson = 35 votes = 5.65%
- Other = 10 votes = 1.61%


Antrim - 652 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 195 votes = 29.91%

- Edwards = 106 votes = 16.26%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.31%
- Kucinich = 26 votes = 3.99%
- Obama = 272 votes = 41.72%
- Richardson = 47 votes = 7.21%
- Other = 4 votes = 0.61%


Ashland - 415 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 168 votes = 40.48%

- Edwards = 63 votes = 15.18%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 9 votes = 2.17%
- Obama = 144 votes = 34.70%
- Richardson = 31 votes = 7.47%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Atkinson - 1,469 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 718 votes = 48.88%

- Edwards = 253 votes = 17.22%
- Gravel = 4 votes = 0.27%
- Kucinich = 12 votes = 0.82%
- Obama = 434 votes = 29.54%
- Richardson = 39 votes = 2.65%
- Other = 9 votes = 0.61%


Auburn - 1,098 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 433 votes = 39.44%

- Edwards = 184 votes = 16.76%
- Gravel = 3 votes = 0.27%
- Kucinich = 6 votes = 0.55%
- Obama = 397 votes = 36.16%
- Richardson = 51 votes = 4.64%
- Other = 24 votes = 2.19%


Barnstead - 913 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 332 votes = 36.36%
- Edwards = 183 votes = 20.04%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.11%
- Kucinich = 10 votes = 1.10%
- Obama = 345 votes = 37.79%
- Richardson = 34 votes = 3.72%
- Other = 8 votes = 0.88%


Barrington - 1,941 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 713 votes = 36.73%
- Edwards = 408 votes = 21.02%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.10%
- Kucinich = 41 votes = 2.11%
- Obama = 659 votes = 33.95%
- Richardson = 93 votes = 4.79%
- Other = 25 votes = 1.29%


Bartlett - 788 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 281 votes = 35.66%
- Edwards = 129 votes = 16.37%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 17 votes = 2.16%
- Obama = 297 votes = 37.69%
- Richardson = 60 votes = 7.61%
- Other = 4 votes = 0.51%


Bath - 154 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 57 votes = 37.01%
- Edwards = 30 votes = 19.48%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.65%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 0.65%
- Obama = 60 votes = 38.96%
- Richardson = 5 votes = 3.25%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Bedford - 4,021 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1630 votes = 40.54%
- Edwards = 529 votes = 13.16%
- Gravel = 5 votes = 0.12%
- Kucinich = 29 votes = 0.72%
- Obama = 1614 votes = 40.14%
- Richardson = 183 votes = 4.55%
- Other = 31 votes = 0.77%


Belmont - 1,305 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 570 votes = 43.68%
- Edwards = 266 votes = 20.38%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.15%
- Kucinich = 3 votes = 0.23%
- Obama = 375 votes = 28.74%
- Richardson = 58 votes = 4.44%
- Other = 31 votes = 2.38%


Bennington - 295 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 82 votes = 27.80%
- Edwards = 71 votes = 24.07%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 6 votes = 2.03%
- Obama = 119 votes = 40.34%
- Richardson = 15 votes = 5.08%
- Other = 2 votes = 0.68%


Benton - 57 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 19 votes = 33.33%
- Edwards = 13 votes = 22.81%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 1.75%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 1.75%
- Obama = 16 votes = 28.07%
- Richardson = 5 votes = 8.77%
- Other = 2 votes = 3.51%

Berlin - 2,739 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1368 votes = 49.95%
- Edwards = 618 votes = 22.56%
- Gravel = 5 votes = 0.18%
- Kucinich = 9 votes = 0.33%
- Obama = 602 votes = 21.98%
- Richardson = 84 votes = 3.07%
- Other = 53 votes = 1.94%


Bethlehem - 613 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 205 votes = 33.44%
- Edwards = 135 votes = 22.02%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.16%
- Kucinich = 13 votes = 2.12%
- Obama = 232 votes = 37.85%
- Richardson = 22 votes = 3.59%
- Other = 5 votes = 0.82%


Boscawen - 738 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 328 votes = 44.44%
- Edwards = 105 votes = 14.23%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 4 votes = 0.54%
- Obama = 255 votes = 34.55%
- Richardson = 36 votes = 4.88%
- Other = 10 votes = 1.36%

Bow - 1,975 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 701 votes = 35.49%
- Edwards = 314 votes = 15.90%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.05%
- Kucinich = 15 votes = 0.76%
- Obama = 810 votes = 41.01%
- Richardson = 114 votes = 5.77%
- Other = 20 votes = 1.01%


Bradford - 434 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 106 votes = 24.42%
- Edwards = 80 votes = 18.43%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 10 votes = 2.30%
- Obama = 214 votes = 49.31%
- Richardson = 20 votes = 4.61%
- Other = 4 votes = 0.92%


Brentwood - 838 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 332 votes = 39.62%

- Edwards = 147 votes = 17.54%
- Gravel = 5 votes = 0.60%
- Kucinich = 17 votes = 2.03%
- Obama = 303 votes = 36.16%
- Richardson = 31 votes = 3.70%
- Other = 3 votes = 0.36%


Bridgewater - 246 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 97 votes = 39.43%
- Edwards = 43 votes = 17.48%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 9 votes = 3.66%
- Obama = 83 votes = 33.74%
- Richardson = 10 votes = 4.07%
- Other = 4 votes = 1.63%

Bristol - 607 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 227 votes = 37.40%

- Edwards = 101 votes = 16.64%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 7 votes = 1.15%
- Obama = 236 votes = 38.88%
- Richardson = 26 votes = 4.28%
- Other = 10 votes = 1.65%


Brookfield - 176 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 60 votes = 34.09%
- Edwards = 27 votes = 15.34%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.57%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 52 votes = 29.55%
- Richardson = 18 votes = 10.23%
- Other = 18 votes = 10.23%

Brookline - 935 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 342 votes = 36.58%
- Edwards = 158 votes = 16.90%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.21%
- Kucinich = 14 votes = 1.50%
- Obama = 370 votes = 39.57%
- Richardson = 42 votes = 4.49%
- Other = 7 votes = 0.75%


Campton - 754 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 255 votes = 33.82%

- Edwards = 129 votes = 17.11%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.13%
- Kucinich = 16 votes = 2.12%
- Obama = 285 votes = 37.80%
- Richardson = 51 votes = 6.76%
- Other = 17 votes = 2.25%


Canaan - 758 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 262 votes = 34.56%
- Edwards = 142 votes = 18.73%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 13 votes = 1.72%
- Obama = 306 votes = 40.37%
- Richardson = 29 votes = 3.83%
- Other = 6 votes = 0.79%


Candia - 857 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 342 votes = 39.91%

- Edwards = 157 votes = 18.32%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.12%
- Kucinich = 7 votes = 0.82%
- Obama = 274 votes = 31.97%
- Richardson = 51 votes = 5.95%
- Other = 25 votes = 2.92%


Canterbury - 817 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 258 votes = 31.58%
- Edwards = 130 votes = 15.91%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 17 votes = 2.08%
- Obama = 355 votes = 43.45%
- Richardson = 51 votes = 6.24%
- Other = 6 votes = 0.73%


Carroll - 214 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 94 votes = 43.93%
- Edwards = 31 votes = 14.49%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 76 votes = 35.51%
- Richardson = 10 votes = 4.67%
- Other = 3 votes = 1.40%

Center Harbor - 283 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 88 votes = 31.10%

- Edwards = 59 votes = 20.85%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 0.35%
- Obama = 91 votes = 32.16%
- Richardson = 17 votes = 6.01%
- Other = 27 votes = 9.54%


Charlestown - 1,103 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 480 votes = 43.52%
- Edwards = 174 votes = 15.78%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.09%
- Kucinich = 10 votes = 0.91%
- Obama = 377 votes = 34.18%
- Richardson = 54 votes = 4.90%
- Other = 7 votes = 0.63%

Chatham - 67 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 15 votes = 22.39%

- Edwards = 17 votes = 25.37%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 3 votes = 4.48%
- Obama = 28 votes = 41.79%
- Richardson = 3 votes = 4.48%
- Other = 1 votes = 1.49%


Chester - 828 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 335 votes = 40.46%

- Edwards = 128 votes = 15.46%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 6 votes = 0.72%
- Obama = 327 votes = 39.49%
- Richardson = 27 votes = 3.26%
- Other = 5 votes = 0.60%


Chesterfield - 952 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 311 votes = 32.67%

- Edwards = 190 votes = 19.96%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.11%
- Kucinich = 22 votes = 2.31%
- Obama = 367 votes = 38.55%
- Richardson = 53 votes = 5.57%
- Other = 8 votes = 0.84%


Chichester - 591 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 226 votes = 38.24%
- Edwards = 85 votes = 14.38%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.17%
- Kucinich = 3 votes = 0.51%
- Obama = 225 votes = 38.07%
- Richardson = 44 votes = 7.45%
- Other = 7 votes = 1.18%

Claremont - 2,602 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 1114 votes = 42.81%
- Edwards = 443 votes = 17.03%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.04%
- Kucinich = 17 votes = 0.65%
- Obama = 901 votes = 34.63%
- Richardson = 84 votes = 3.23%
- Other = 42 votes = 1.61%

Clarksville - 49 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 20 votes = 40.82%
- Edwards = 3 votes = 6.12%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 17 votes = 34.69%
- Richardson = 1 votes = 2.04%
- Other = 8 votes = 16.33%

Colebrook - 339 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 115 votes = 33.92%

- Edwards = 50 votes = 14.75%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.59%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 0.59%
- Obama = 134 votes = 39.53%
- Richardson = 18 votes = 5.31%
- Other = 18 votes = 5.31%


Columbia - 111 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 48 votes = 43.24%
- Edwards = 19 votes = 17.12%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 39 votes = 35.14%
- Richardson = 3 votes = 2.70%
- Other = 2 votes = 1.80%

Concord - 10,939 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 3898 votes = 35.63%
- Edwards = 1750 votes = 16.00%
- Gravel = 11 votes = 0.10%
- Kucinich = 158 votes = 1.44%
- Obama = 4367 votes = 39.92%
- Richardson = 639 votes = 5.84%
- Other = 116 votes = 1.06%


Conway - 2,199 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 773 votes = 35.15%
- Edwards = 328 votes = 14.92%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.05%
- Kucinich = 61 votes = 2.77%
- Obama = 885 votes = 40.25%
- Richardson = 148 votes = 6.73%
- Other = 3 votes = 0.14%


Cornish - 572 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 149 votes = 26.05%

- Edwards = 129 votes = 22.55%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 8 votes = 1.40%
- Obama = 236 votes = 41.26%
- Richardson = 29 votes = 5.07%
- Other = 21 votes = 3.67%


Croydon - 142 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 46 votes = 32.39%

- Edwards = 18 votes = 12.68%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 1.41%
- Obama = 69 votes = 48.59%
- Richardson = 6 votes = 4.23%
- Other = 1 votes = 0.70%


Dalton - 167 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 61 votes = 36.53%

- Edwards = 33 votes = 19.76%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 0.60%
- Obama = 68 votes = 40.72%
- Richardson = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Other = 4 votes = 2.40%


Danbury - 246 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 89 votes = 36.18%

- Edwards = 37 votes = 15.04%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 4 votes = 1.63%
- Obama = 93 votes = 37.80%
- Richardson = 19 votes = 7.72%
- Other = 4 votes = 1.63%


Danville - 779 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 387 votes = 49.68%

- Edwards = 142 votes = 18.23%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.26%
- Kucinich = 10 votes = 1.28%
- Obama = 212 votes = 27.21%
- Richardson = 14 votes = 1.80%
- Other = 12 votes = 1.54%


Deerfield - 933 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 323 votes = 34.62%
- Edwards = 157 votes = 16.83%
- Gravel = 4 votes = 0.43%
- Kucinich = 21 votes = 2.25%
- Obama = 353 votes = 37.83%
- Richardson = 57 votes = 6.11%
- Other = 18 votes = 1.93%


Deering - 444 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 150 votes = 33.78%

- Edwards = 83 votes = 18.69%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.45%
- Kucinich = 5 votes = 1.13%
- Obama = 182 votes = 40.99%
- Richardson = 19 votes = 4.28%
- Other = 3 votes = 0.68%


Derry - 5,230 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 2387 votes = 45.64%

- Edwards = 996 votes = 19.04%
- Gravel = 5 votes = 0.10%
- Kucinich = 38 votes = 0.73%
- Obama = 1632 votes = 31.20%
- Richardson = 149 votes = 2.85%
- Other = 23 votes = 0.44%


Dixville - 10 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 0 votes = 0.00%

- Edwards = 2 votes = 20.00%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 7 votes = 70.00%
- Richardson = 1 votes = 10.00%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Dorchester - 55 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 12 votes = 21.82%

- Edwards = 10 votes = 18.18%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 6 votes = 10.91%
- Obama = 23 votes = 41.82%
- Richardson = 3 votes = 5.45%
- Other = 1 votes = 1.82%


Dover - 7,405 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 2901 votes = 39.18%

- Edwards = 1205 votes = 16.27%
- Gravel = 7 votes = 0.09%
- Kucinich = 170 votes = 2.30%
- Obama = 2772 votes = 37.43%
- Richardson = 273 votes = 3.69%
- Other = 77 votes = 1.04%


Dublin - 494 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 133 votes = 26.92%

- Edwards = 79 votes = 15.99%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 9 votes = 1.82%
- Obama = 245 votes = 49.60%
- Richardson = 25 votes = 5.06%
- Other = 3 votes = 0.61%


Dummer - 0 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
NO VOTES
Dunbarton - 601 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 224 votes = 37.27%

- Edwards = 91 votes = 15.14%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.17%
- Kucinich = 8 votes = 1.33%
- Obama = 234 votes = 38.94%
- Richardson = 37 votes = 6.16%
- Other = 6 votes = 1.00%


Durham - 2,701 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 806 votes = 29.84%
- Edwards = 331 votes = 12.25%
- Gravel = 4 votes = 0.15%
- Kucinich = 108 votes = 4.00%
- Obama = 1302 votes = 48.20%
- Richardson = 142 votes = 5.26%
- Other = 8 votes = 0.30%


East Kingston - 493 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 205 votes = 41.58%
- Edwards = 95 votes = 19.27%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.20%
- Kucinich = 7 votes = 1.42%
- Obama = 158 votes = 32.05%
- Richardson = 13 votes = 2.64%
- Other = 14 votes = 2.84%

Easton - 105 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 24 votes = 22.86%

- Edwards = 26 votes = 24.76%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 1.90%
- Obama = 46 votes = 43.81%
- Richardson = 7 votes = 6.67%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Eaton - 140 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 40 votes = 28.57%

- Edwards = 9 votes = 6.43%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 79 votes = 56.43%
- Richardson = 12 votes = 8.57%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Effingham - 296 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 124 votes = 41.89%
- Edwards = 53 votes = 17.91%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.34%
- Kucinich = 4 votes = 1.35%
- Obama = 94 votes = 31.76%
- Richardson = 18 votes = 6.08%
- Other = 2 votes = 0.68%

Ellsworth - 24 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 8 votes = 33.33%

- Edwards = 6 votes = 25.00%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 4.17%
- Obama = 9 votes = 37.50%
- Richardson = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Enfield - 1,026 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 334 votes = 32.55%
- Edwards = 220 votes = 21.44%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.10%
- Kucinich = 8 votes = 0.78%
- Obama = 395 votes = 38.50%
- Richardson = 53 votes = 5.17%
- Other = 15 votes = 1.46%


Epping - 1,269 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 578 votes = 45.55%

- Edwards = 245 votes = 19.31%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.16%
- Kucinich = 9 votes = 0.71%
- Obama = 374 votes = 29.47%
- Richardson = 54 votes = 4.26%
- Other = 7 votes = 0.55%


Epsom - 899 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 372 votes = 41.38%

- Edwards = 204 votes = 22.69%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.11%
- Kucinich = 6 votes = 0.67%
- Obama = 255 votes = 28.36%
- Richardson = 44 votes = 4.89%
- Other = 17 votes = 1.89%


Errol - 72 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 16 votes = 22.22%

- Edwards = 9 votes = 12.50%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 27 votes = 37.50%
- Richardson = 12 votes = 16.67%
- Other = 8 votes = 11.11%


Exeter - 3,964 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1407 votes = 35.49%
- Edwards = 584 votes = 14.73%
- Gravel = 5 votes = 0.13%
- Kucinich = 52 votes = 1.31%
- Obama = 1698 votes = 42.84%
- Richardson = 166 votes = 4.19%
- Other = 52 votes = 1.31%


Farmington - 1,181 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 559 votes = 47.33%

- Edwards = 219 votes = 18.54%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 21 votes = 1.78%
- Obama = 322 votes = 27.27%
- Richardson = 46 votes = 3.90%
- Other = 14 votes = 1.19%


Fitzwilliam - 605 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 232 votes = 38.35%
- Edwards = 106 votes = 17.52%
- Gravel = 3 votes = 0.50%
- Kucinich = 8 votes = 1.32%
- Obama = 154 votes = 25.45%
- Richardson = 33 votes = 5.45%
- Other = 69 votes = 11.40%

Francestown - 459 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 110 votes = 23.97%
- Edwards = 87 votes = 18.95%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 5 votes = 1.09%
- Obama = 227 votes = 49.46%
- Richardson = 28 votes = 6.10%
- Other = 2 votes = 0.44%


Franconia - 0 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
NO VOTES
Franklin - 1,679 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 777 votes = 46.28%
- Edwards = 334 votes = 19.89%
- Gravel = 3 votes = 0.18%
- Kucinich = 16 votes = 0.95%
- Obama = 452 votes = 26.92%
- Richardson = 71 votes = 4.23%
- Other = 26 votes = 1.55%

Freedom - 319 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: TOWNSHIP OF,Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 103 votes = 32.29%

- Edwards = 62 votes = 19.44%
- Gravel = 3 votes = 0.94%
- Kucinich = 7 votes = 2.19%
- Obama = 128 votes = 40.13%
- Richardson = 15 votes = 4.70%
- Other = 1 votes = 0.31%


Fremont - 742 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 310 votes = 41.78%

- Edwards = 157 votes = 21.16%
- Gravel = 4 votes = 0.54%
- Kucinich = 5 votes = 0.67%
- Obama = 228 votes = 30.73%
- Richardson = 26 votes = 3.50%
- Other = 12 votes = 1.62%


Gilford - 1,633 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 595 votes = 36.44%
- Edwards = 246 votes = 15.06%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.12%
- Kucinich = 19 votes = 1.16%
- Obama = 668 votes = 40.91%
- Richardson = 80 votes = 4.90%
- Other = 23 votes = 1.41%


Gilmanton - 761 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 273 votes = 35.87%
- Edwards = 130 votes = 17.08%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.13%
- Kucinich = 7 votes = 0.92%
- Obama = 284 votes = 37.32%
- Richardson = 55 votes = 7.23%
- Other = 11 votes = 1.45%


Gilsum - 212 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 49 votes = 23.11%

- Edwards = 36 votes = 16.98%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 36 votes = 16.98%
- Obama = 73 votes = 34.43%
- Richardson = 18 votes = 8.49%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Goffstown - 3,335 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1352 votes = 40.54%

- Edwards = 542 votes = 16.25%
- Gravel = 10 votes = 0.30%
- Kucinich = 26 votes = 0.78%
- Obama = 1144 votes = 34.30%
- Richardson = 204 votes = 6.12%
- Other = 57 votes = 1.71%


Gorham - 812 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 330 votes = 40.64%

- Edwards = 199 votes = 24.51%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.12%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 221 votes = 27.22%
- Richardson = 39 votes = 4.80%
- Other = 22 votes = 2.71%


Goshen - 174 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 55 votes = 31.61%

- Edwards = 34 votes = 19.54%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 1.15%
- Obama = 68 votes = 39.08%
- Richardson = 11 votes = 6.32%
- Other = 4 votes = 2.30%


Grafton - 269 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 99 votes = 36.80%

- Edwards = 62 votes = 23.05%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 3 votes = 1.12%
- Obama = 93 votes = 34.57%
- Richardson = 9 votes = 3.35%
- Other = 3 votes = 1.12%


Grantham - 905 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 294 votes = 32.49%
- Edwards = 128 votes = 14.14%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 4 votes = 0.44%
- Obama = 433 votes = 47.85%
- Richardson = 45 votes = 4.97%
- Other = 1 votes = 0.11%


Greenfield - 0 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
NO VOTES
Greenland - 902 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 351 votes = 38.91%
- Edwards = 137 votes = 15.19%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.11%
- Kucinich = 7 votes = 0.78%
- Obama = 355 votes = 39.36%
- Richardson = 44 votes = 4.88%
- Other = 7 votes = 0.78%


Greenville - 406 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 198 votes = 48.77%
- Edwards = 48 votes = 11.82%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.49%
- Kucinich = 5 votes = 1.23%
- Obama = 96 votes = 23.65%
- Richardson = 54 votes = 13.30%
- Other = 3 votes = 0.74%

Groton - 0 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
NO VOTES
Hampstead - 1,760 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 813 votes = 46.19%

- Edwards = 310 votes = 17.61%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.11%
- Kucinich = 14 votes = 0.80%
- Obama = 543 votes = 30.85%
- Richardson = 52 votes = 2.95%
- Other = 26 votes = 1.48%


Hampton - 3,974 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1700 votes = 42.78%

- Edwards = 750 votes = 18.87%
- Gravel = 4 votes = 0.10%
- Kucinich = 25 votes = 0.63%
- Obama = 1295 votes = 32.59%
- Richardson = 150 votes = 3.77%
- Other = 50 votes = 1.26%


Hampton Falls - 431 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 146 votes = 33.87%
- Edwards = 84 votes = 19.49%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 3 votes = 0.70%
- Obama = 176 votes = 40.84%
- Richardson = 15 votes = 3.48%
- Other = 7 votes = 1.62%


Hancock - 611 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 139 votes = 22.75%

- Edwards = 89 votes = 14.57%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 17 votes = 2.78%
- Obama = 331 votes = 54.17%
- Richardson = 31 votes = 5.07%
- Other = 4 votes = 0.65%


Hanover - 4,778 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1248 votes = 26.12%
- Edwards = 459 votes = 9.61%
- Gravel = 4 votes = 0.08%
- Kucinich = 58 votes = 1.21%
- Obama = 2779 votes = 58.16%
- Richardson = 220 votes = 4.60%
- Other = 10 votes = 0.21%


Harrisville - 462 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 142 votes = 30.74%

- Edwards = 67 votes = 14.50%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 9 votes = 1.95%
- Obama = 213 votes = 46.10%
- Richardson = 25 votes = 5.41%
- Other = 6 votes = 1.30%


Harts Location - 13 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 3 votes = 23.08%

- Edwards = 1 votes = 7.69%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 9 votes = 69.23%
- Richardson = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Haverhill - 555 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 198 votes = 35.68%

- Edwards = 102 votes = 18.38%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.18%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 0.36%
- Obama = 223 votes = 40.18%
- Richardson = 23 votes = 4.14%
- Other = 6 votes = 1.08%


Hebron - 140 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 41 votes = 29.29%

- Edwards = 14 votes = 10.00%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 47 votes = 33.57%
- Richardson = 22 votes = 15.71%
- Other = 16 votes = 11.43%


Henniker - 1,085 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 335 votes = 30.88%
- Edwards = 207 votes = 19.08%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 15 votes = 1.38%
- Obama = 447 votes = 41.20%
- Richardson = 70 votes = 6.45%
- Other = 11 votes = 1.01%


Hill - 214 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 83 votes = 38.79%
- Edwards = 41 votes = 19.16%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.47%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 0.47%
- Obama = 63 votes = 29.44%
- Richardson = 24 votes = 11.21%
- Other = 1 votes = 0.47%

Hillsborough - 1,115 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 401 votes = 35.96%

- Edwards = 211 votes = 18.92%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.18%
- Kucinich = 18 votes = 1.61%
- Obama = 414 votes = 37.13%
- Richardson = 64 votes = 5.74%
- Other = 5 votes = 0.45%


Hinsdale - 755 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 331 votes = 43.84%
- Edwards = 128 votes = 16.95%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 8 votes = 1.06%
- Obama = 256 votes = 33.91%
- Richardson = 25 votes = 3.31%
- Other = 7 votes = 0.93%

Holderness - 569 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 207 votes = 36.38%

- Edwards = 87 votes = 15.29%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 11 votes = 1.93%
- Obama = 233 votes = 40.95%
- Richardson = 28 votes = 4.92%
- Other = 3 votes = 0.53%


Hollis - 1,923 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 683 votes = 35.52%
- Edwards = 327 votes = 17.00%
- Gravel = 3 votes = 0.16%
- Kucinich = 28 votes = 1.46%
- Obama = 792 votes = 41.19%
- Richardson = 75 votes = 3.90%
- Other = 15 votes = 0.78%


Hooksett - 2,600 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1100 votes = 42.31%

- Edwards = 427 votes = 16.42%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.04%
- Kucinich = 19 votes = 0.73%
- Obama = 812 votes = 31.23%
- Richardson = 157 votes = 6.04%
- Other = 84 votes = 3.23%


Hopkinton - 1,909 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 526 votes = 27.55%
- Edwards = 299 votes = 15.66%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 46 votes = 2.41%
- Obama = 898 votes = 47.04%
- Richardson = 120 votes = 6.29%
- Other = 20 votes = 1.05%


Hudson - 4,376 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1997 votes = 45.64%

- Edwards = 798 votes = 18.24%
- Gravel = 6 votes = 0.14%
- Kucinich = 31 votes = 0.71%
- Obama = 1353 votes = 30.92%
- Richardson = 130 votes = 2.97%
- Other = 61 votes = 1.39%


Jackson - 387 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 108 votes = 27.91%

- Edwards = 52 votes = 13.44%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.52%
- Kucinich = 14 votes = 3.62%
- Obama = 174 votes = 44.96%
- Richardson = 35 votes = 9.04%
- Other = 2 votes = 0.52%


Jaffrey - 1,228 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 462 votes = 37.62%

- Edwards = 215 votes = 17.51%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.16%
- Kucinich = 17 votes = 1.38%
- Obama = 460 votes = 37.46%
- Richardson = 57 votes = 4.64%
- Other = 15 votes = 1.22%


Jefferson - 214 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 74 votes = 34.58%
- Edwards = 27 votes = 12.62%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.47%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 74 votes = 34.58%
- Richardson = 9 votes = 4.21%
- Other = 29 votes = 13.55%


Keene - 6,282 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1922 votes = 30.60%
- Edwards = 1040 votes = 16.56%
- Gravel = 8 votes = 0.13%
- Kucinich = 287 votes = 4.57%
- Obama = 2553 votes = 40.64%
- Richardson = 407 votes = 6.48%
- Other = 65 votes = 1.03%


Kensington - 507 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 212 votes = 41.81%
- Edwards = 91 votes = 17.95%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 0.39%
- Obama = 182 votes = 35.90%
- Richardson = 17 votes = 3.35%
- Other = 3 votes = 0.59%

Kingston - 1,113 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 488 votes = 43.85%

- Edwards = 197 votes = 17.70%
- Gravel = 4 votes = 0.36%
- Kucinich = 11 votes = 0.99%
- Obama = 342 votes = 30.73%
- Richardson = 37 votes = 3.32%
- Other = 34 votes = 3.05%


Laconia - 3,131 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1216 votes = 38.84%

- Edwards = 604 votes = 19.29%
- Gravel = 6 votes = 0.19%
- Kucinich = 23 votes = 0.73%
- Obama = 1163 votes = 37.14%
- Richardson = 105 votes = 3.35%
- Other = 14 votes = 0.45%


Lancaster - 607 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 186 votes = 30.64%

- Edwards = 135 votes = 22.24%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 10 votes = 1.65%
- Obama = 223 votes = 36.74%
- Richardson = 40 votes = 6.59%
- Other = 13 votes = 2.14%


Landaff - 103 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 21 votes = 20.39%

- Edwards = 22 votes = 21.36%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 40 votes = 38.83%
- Richardson = 3 votes = 2.91%
- Other = 17 votes = 16.50%


Langdon - 165 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 60 votes = 36.36%

- Edwards = 25 votes = 15.15%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 3 votes = 1.82%
- Obama = 61 votes = 36.97%
- Richardson = 16 votes = 9.70%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Lebanon - 3,267 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1121 votes = 34.31%
- Edwards = 492 votes = 15.06%
- Gravel = 3 votes = 0.09%
- Kucinich = 34 votes = 1.04%
- Obama = 1441 votes = 44.11%
- Richardson = 147 votes = 4.50%
- Other = 29 votes = 0.89%


Lee - 1,336 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 484 votes = 36.23%

- Edwards = 268 votes = 20.06%
- Gravel = 3 votes = 0.22%
- Kucinich = 32 votes = 2.40%
- Obama = 466 votes = 34.88%
- Richardson = 77 votes = 5.76%
- Other = 6 votes = 0.45%


Lempster - 212 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 75 votes = 35.38%

- Edwards = 38 votes = 17.92%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 3 votes = 1.42%
- Obama = 85 votes = 40.09%
- Richardson = 11 votes = 5.19%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Lincoln - 293 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 127 votes = 43.34%
- Edwards = 42 votes = 14.33%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.34%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 0.68%
- Obama = 105 votes = 35.84%
- Richardson = 14 votes = 4.78%
- Other = 2 votes = 0.68%

Lisbon - 252 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 89 votes = 35.32%

- Edwards = 52 votes = 20.63%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 0.40%
- Obama = 100 votes = 39.68%
- Richardson = 9 votes = 3.57%
- Other = 1 votes = 0.40%


Litchfield - 1,565 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 674 votes = 43.07%

- Edwards = 295 votes = 18.85%
- Gravel = 4 votes = 0.26%
- Kucinich = 15 votes = 0.96%
- Obama = 503 votes = 32.14%
- Richardson = 63 votes = 4.03%
- Other = 11 votes = 0.70%


Littleton - 1,070 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 332 votes = 31.03%
- Edwards = 197 votes = 18.41%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 11 votes = 1.03%
- Obama = 457 votes = 42.71%
- Richardson = 49 votes = 4.58%
- Other = 24 votes = 2.24%


Londonderry - 5,369 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1958 votes = 36.47%

- Edwards = 780 votes = 14.53%
- Gravel = 6 votes = 0.11%
- Kucinich = 40 votes = 0.75%
- Obama = 1803 votes = 33.58%
- Richardson = 155 votes = 2.89%
- Other = 627 votes = 11.68%


Loudon - 992 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 409 votes = 41.23%

- Edwards = 189 votes = 19.05%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.10%
- Kucinich = 12 votes = 1.21%
- Obama = 327 votes = 32.96%
- Richardson = 41 votes = 4.13%
- Other = 13 votes = 1.31%


Lyman - 114 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 34 votes = 29.82%

- Edwards = 23 votes = 20.18%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 47 votes = 41.23%
- Richardson = 7 votes = 6.14%
- Other = 3 votes = 2.63%


Lyme - 705 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 154 votes = 21.84%

- Edwards = 129 votes = 18.30%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.28%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 381 votes = 54.04%
- Richardson = 29 votes = 4.11%
- Other = 10 votes = 1.42%


Lyndeborough - 387 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 156 votes = 40.31%
- Edwards = 68 votes = 17.57%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.52%
- Kucinich = 8 votes = 2.07%
- Obama = 124 votes = 32.04%
- Richardson = 28 votes = 7.24%
- Other = 1 votes = 0.26%

Madbury - 547 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 207 votes = 37.84%

- Edwards = 75 votes = 13.71%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.37%
- Kucinich = 18 votes = 3.29%
- Obama = 209 votes = 38.21%
- Richardson = 32 votes = 5.85%
- Other = 4 votes = 0.73%


Madison - 646 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 234 votes = 36.22%
- Edwards = 90 votes = 13.93%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 11 votes = 1.70%
- Obama = 257 votes = 39.78%
- Richardson = 48 votes = 7.43%
- Other = 6 votes = 0.93%


Manchester - 20,935 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan
- Clinton = 9492 votes = 45.34%

- Edwards = 3283 votes = 15.68%
- Gravel = 44 votes = 0.21%
- Kucinich = 192 votes = 0.92%
- Obama = 6382 votes = 30.48%
- Richardson = 961 votes = 4.59%
- Other = 581 votes = 2.78%


Marlborough - 651 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 188 votes = 28.88%

- Edwards = 92 votes = 14.13%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 16 votes = 2.46%
- Obama = 305 votes = 46.85%
- Richardson = 47 votes = 7.22%
- Other = 3 votes = 0.46%


Marlow - 203 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 79 votes = 38.92%
- Edwards = 26 votes = 12.81%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 3 votes = 1.48%
- Obama = 65 votes = 32.02%
- Richardson = 26 votes = 12.81%
- Other = 4 votes = 1.97%

Mason - 286 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 108 votes = 37.76%
- Edwards = 60 votes = 20.98%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 0.70%
- Obama = 91 votes = 31.82%
- Richardson = 25 votes = 8.74%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%

Meredith - 1,441 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 513 votes = 35.60%
- Edwards = 246 votes = 17.07%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 12 votes = 0.83%
- Obama = 589 votes = 40.87%
- Richardson = 64 votes = 4.44%
- Other = 17 votes = 1.18%


Merrimack - 5,478 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 2325 votes = 42.44%

- Edwards = 853 votes = 15.57%
- Gravel = 9 votes = 0.16%
- Kucinich = 42 votes = 0.77%
- Obama = 1954 votes = 35.67%
- Richardson = 228 votes = 4.16%
- Other = 67 votes = 1.22%


Middleton - 350 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 170 votes = 48.57%
- Edwards = 79 votes = 22.57%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 0.57%
- Obama = 78 votes = 22.29%
- Richardson = 13 votes = 3.71%
- Other = 8 votes = 2.29%

Milan - 328 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 132 votes = 40.24%

- Edwards = 89 votes = 27.13%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.30%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 85 votes = 25.91%
- Richardson = 16 votes = 4.88%
- Other = 5 votes = 1.52%


Milford - 2,833 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1092 votes = 38.55%

- Edwards = 496 votes = 17.51%
- Gravel = 4 votes = 0.14%
- Kucinich = 33 votes = 1.16%
- Obama = 1052 votes = 37.13%
- Richardson = 145 votes = 5.12%
- Other = 11 votes = 0.39%


Millsfield - 6 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 4 votes = 66.67%
- Edwards = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 1 votes = 16.67%
- Richardson = 1 votes = 16.67%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%

Milton - 877 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 389 votes = 44.36%

- Edwards = 192 votes = 21.89%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 12 votes = 1.37%
- Obama = 235 votes = 26.80%
- Richardson = 30 votes = 3.42%
- Other = 19 votes = 2.17%


Monroe - 125 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 48 votes = 38.40%

- Edwards = 26 votes = 20.80%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.80%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 0.80%
- Obama = 49 votes = 39.20%
- Richardson = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Mont Vernon - 570 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 201 votes = 35.26%

- Edwards = 93 votes = 16.32%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.18%
- Kucinich = 7 votes = 1.23%
- Obama = 232 votes = 40.70%
- Richardson = 31 votes = 5.44%
- Other = 5 votes = 0.88%


Moultonborough - 952 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 298 votes = 31.30%

- Edwards = 166 votes = 17.44%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 6 votes = 0.63%
- Obama = 416 votes = 43.70%
- Richardson = 57 votes = 5.99%
- Other = 9 votes = 0.95%


Nashua - 17,160 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 7713 votes = 44.95%

- Edwards = 2911 votes = 16.96%
- Gravel = 42 votes = 0.24%
- Kucinich = 119 votes = 0.69%
- Obama = 5597 votes = 32.62%
- Richardson = 563 votes = 3.28%
- Other = 215 votes = 1.25%


Nelson - 233 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 33 votes = 14.16%

- Edwards = 44 votes = 18.88%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 12 votes = 5.15%
- Obama = 122 votes = 52.36%
- Richardson = 19 votes = 8.15%
- Other = 3 votes = 1.29%


New Boston - 1,111 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 366 votes = 32.94%

- Edwards = 160 votes = 14.40%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 22 votes = 1.98%
- Obama = 482 votes = 43.38%
- Richardson = 63 votes = 5.67%
- Other = 18 votes = 1.62%


Newbury - 546 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 183 votes = 33.52%
- Edwards = 86 votes = 15.75%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 228 votes = 41.76%
- Richardson = 47 votes = 8.61%
- Other = 2 votes = 0.37%


New Castle - 313 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 90 votes = 28.75%

- Edwards = 23 votes = 7.35%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 0.32%
- Obama = 190 votes = 60.70%
- Richardson = 9 votes = 2.88%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


New Durham - 560 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 209 votes = 37.32%
- Edwards = 110 votes = 19.64%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.18%
- Kucinich = 9 votes = 1.61%
- Obama = 194 votes = 34.64%
- Richardson = 34 votes = 6.07%
- Other = 3 votes = 0.54%

Newfields - 457 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 159 votes = 34.79%
- Edwards = 97 votes = 21.23%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 3 votes = 0.66%
- Obama = 175 votes = 38.29%
- Richardson = 19 votes = 4.16%
- Other = 4 votes = 0.88%


New Hampton - 515 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 187 votes = 36.31%

- Edwards = 96 votes = 18.64%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.19%
- Kucinich = 14 votes = 2.72%
- Obama = 180 votes = 34.95%
- Richardson = 25 votes = 4.85%
- Other = 12 votes = 2.33%


Newington - 213 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 88 votes = 41.31%
- Edwards = 29 votes = 13.62%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 0.94%
- Obama = 83 votes = 38.97%
- Richardson = 10 votes = 4.69%
- Other = 1 votes = 0.47%

New Ipswich - 717 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 277 votes = 38.63%

- Edwards = 131 votes = 18.27%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 11 votes = 1.53%
- Obama = 211 votes = 29.43%
- Richardson = 77 votes = 10.74%
- Other = 10 votes = 1.39%


New London - 1,102 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 306 votes = 27.77%
- Edwards = 122 votes = 11.07%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.09%
- Kucinich = 14 votes = 1.27%
- Obama = 574 votes = 52.09%
- Richardson = 81 votes = 7.35%
- Other = 4 votes = 0.36%


Newmarket - 2,426 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 940 votes = 38.75%

- Edwards = 381 votes = 15.70%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.08%
- Kucinich = 41 votes = 1.69%
- Obama = 925 votes = 38.13%
- Richardson = 107 votes = 4.41%
- Other = 30 votes = 1.24%


Newport - 1,183 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 470 votes = 39.73%
- Edwards = 205 votes = 17.33%
- Gravel = 3 votes = 0.25%
- Kucinich = 8 votes = 0.68%
- Obama = 422 votes = 35.67%
- Richardson = 55 votes = 4.65%
- Other = 20 votes = 1.69%

Newton - 888 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 430 votes = 48.42%

- Edwards = 153 votes = 17.23%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 0.11%
- Obama = 259 votes = 29.17%
- Richardson = 23 votes = 2.59%
- Other = 22 votes = 2.48%


Northfield - 925 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 346 votes = 37.41%
- Edwards = 204 votes = 22.05%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 11 votes = 1.19%
- Obama = 298 votes = 32.22%
- Richardson = 58 votes = 6.27%
- Other = 8 votes = 0.86%

North Hampton - 1,153 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 430 votes = 37.29%
- Edwards = 188 votes = 16.31%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.09%
- Kucinich = 11 votes = 0.95%
- Obama = 452 votes = 39.20%
- Richardson = 51 votes = 4.42%
- Other = 20 votes = 1.73%


Northumberland - 511 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 208 votes = 40.70%
- Edwards = 140 votes = 27.40%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.20%
- Kucinich = 5 votes = 0.98%
- Obama = 129 votes = 25.24%
- Richardson = 20 votes = 3.91%
- Other = 8 votes = 1.57%

Northwood - 941 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 372 votes = 39.53%

- Edwards = 193 votes = 20.51%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.21%
- Kucinich = 11 votes = 1.17%
- Obama = 317 votes = 33.69%
- Richardson = 34 votes = 3.61%
- Other = 12 votes = 1.28%


Nottingham - 1,042 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 391 votes = 37.52%
- Edwards = 195 votes = 18.71%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 32 votes = 3.07%
- Obama = 359 votes = 34.45%
- Richardson = 52 votes = 4.99%
- Other = 13 votes = 1.25%

Orange - 78 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 24 votes = 30.77%

- Edwards = 16 votes = 20.51%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 1.28%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 1.28%
- Obama = 35 votes = 44.87%
- Richardson = 1 votes = 1.28%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Orford - 332 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 84 votes = 25.30%

- Edwards = 55 votes = 16.57%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 4 votes = 1.20%
- Obama = 165 votes = 49.70%
- Richardson = 22 votes = 6.63%
- Other = 2 votes = 0.60%


Ossipee - 749 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 281 votes = 37.52%
- Edwards = 141 votes = 18.83%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.13%
- Kucinich = 6 votes = 0.80%
- Obama = 261 votes = 34.85%
- Richardson = 44 votes = 5.87%
- Other = 15 votes = 2.00%

Pelham - 2,484 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1260 votes = 50.72%

- Edwards = 389 votes = 15.66%
- Gravel = 4 votes = 0.16%
- Kucinich = 11 votes = 0.44%
- Obama = 721 votes = 29.03%
- Richardson = 55 votes = 2.21%
- Other = 44 votes = 1.77%


Pembroke - 1,550 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 605 votes = 39.03%

- Edwards = 312 votes = 20.13%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.06%
- Kucinich = 24 votes = 1.55%
- Obama = 493 votes = 31.81%
- Richardson = 91 votes = 5.87%
- Other = 24 votes = 1.55%


[color=blue]Peterborough - 2,082 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optica

_________________
"We seek a free flow of information... we are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people."-John F. Kennedy, Feb. 26th, 1962.


Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:43 pm
Profile YIM WWW
GT Truther
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:46 am
Posts: 2830
Location: Miles from DC in rural PA
Post ANOTHER STOLEN ELECTION PART II
(cont'd)

Peterborough - 2,082 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 549 votes = 26.37%
- Edwards = 347 votes = 16.67%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.05%
- Kucinich = 70 votes = 3.36%
- Obama = 979 votes = 47.02%
- Richardson = 115 votes = 5.52%
- Other = 21 votes = 1.01%


Piermont - 189 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 67 votes = 35.45%

- Edwards = 26 votes = 13.76%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 0.53%
- Obama = 81 votes = 42.86%
- Richardson = 7 votes = 3.70%
- Other = 7 votes = 3.70%


Pittsburg - 127 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 52 votes = 40.94%
- Edwards = 15 votes = 11.81%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 49 votes = 38.58%
- Richardson = 10 votes = 7.87%
- Other = 1 votes = 0.79%

Pittsfield - 691 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 272 votes = 39.36%

- Edwards = 122 votes = 17.66%
- Gravel = 4 votes = 0.58%
- Kucinich = 6 votes = 0.87%
- Obama = 255 votes = 36.90%
- Richardson = 26 votes = 3.76%
- Other = 6 votes = 0.87%


Plainfield - 757 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 194 votes = 25.63%

- Edwards = 135 votes = 17.83%
- Gravel = 3 votes = 0.40%
- Kucinich = 11 votes = 1.45%
- Obama = 378 votes = 49.93%
- Richardson = 34 votes = 4.49%
- Other = 2 votes = 0.26%


Plaistow - 1,374 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 699 votes = 50.87%

- Edwards = 217 votes = 15.79%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 5 votes = 0.36%
- Obama = 389 votes = 28.31%
- Richardson = 28 votes = 2.04%
- Other = 36 votes = 2.62%


Plymouth - 1,393 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 394 votes = 28.28%

- Edwards = 204 votes = 14.64%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.07%
- Kucinich = 54 votes = 3.88%
- Obama = 648 votes = 46.52%
- Richardson = 80 votes = 5.74%
- Other = 12 votes = 0.86%


Portsmouth - 6,758 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 2368 votes = 35.04%
- Edwards = 1071 votes = 15.85%
- Gravel = 9 votes = 0.13%
- Kucinich = 125 votes = 1.85%
- Obama = 2807 votes = 41.54%
- Richardson = 316 votes = 4.68%
- Other = 62 votes = 0.92%


Randolph - 120 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 30 votes = 25.00%

- Edwards = 20 votes = 16.67%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 0.83%
- Obama = 57 votes = 47.50%
- Richardson = 12 votes = 10.00%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Raymond - 1,733 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 797 votes = 45.99%

- Edwards = 320 votes = 18.47%
- Gravel = 5 votes = 0.29%
- Kucinich = 19 votes = 1.10%
- Obama = 473 votes = 27.29%
- Richardson = 83 votes = 4.79%
- Other = 36 votes = 2.08%


Richmond - 283 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 99 votes = 34.98%

- Edwards = 48 votes = 16.96%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 12 votes = 4.24%
- Obama = 106 votes = 37.46%
- Richardson = 17 votes = 6.01%
- Other = 1 votes = 0.35%


Rindge - 978 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 381 votes = 38.96%
- Edwards = 153 votes = 15.64%
- Gravel = 4 votes = 0.41%
- Kucinich = 34 votes = 3.48%
- Obama = 348 votes = 35.58%
- Richardson = 56 votes = 5.73%
- Other = 2 votes = 0.20%

Rochester - 5,939 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 2682 votes = 45.16%

- Edwards = 1133 votes = 19.08%
- Gravel = 7 votes = 0.12%
- Kucinich = 57 votes = 0.96%
- Obama = 1796 votes = 30.24%
- Richardson = 172 votes = 2.90%
- Other = 92 votes = 1.55%


Rollinsford - 721 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 304 votes = 42.16%
- Edwards = 129 votes = 17.89%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 21 votes = 2.91%
- Obama = 224 votes = 31.07%
- Richardson = 26 votes = 3.61%
- Other = 17 votes = 2.36%

Roxbury - 95 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 22 votes = 23.16%

- Edwards = 11 votes = 11.58%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 3 votes = 3.16%
- Obama = 50 votes = 52.63%
- Richardson = 9 votes = 9.47%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Rumney - 321 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 101 votes = 31.46%

- Edwards = 68 votes = 21.18%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 6 votes = 1.87%
- Obama = 116 votes = 36.14%
- Richardson = 29 votes = 9.03%
- Other = 1 votes = 0.31%


Rye - 1,552 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 498 votes = 32.09%
- Edwards = 212 votes = 13.66%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.06%
- Kucinich = 17 votes = 1.10%
- Obama = 713 votes = 45.94%
- Richardson = 92 votes = 5.93%
- Other = 19 votes = 1.22%


Salem - 5,599 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 2867 votes = 51.21%

- Edwards = 953 votes = 17.02%
- Gravel = 7 votes = 0.13%
- Kucinich = 30 votes = 0.54%
- Obama = 1508 votes = 26.93%
- Richardson = 118 votes = 2.11%
- Other = 116 votes = 2.07%


Salisbury - 326 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 116 votes = 35.58%

- Edwards = 58 votes = 17.79%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 8 votes = 2.45%
- Obama = 117 votes = 35.89%
- Richardson = 22 votes = 6.75%
- Other = 5 votes = 1.53%


Sanbornton - 787 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 252 votes = 32.02%
- Edwards = 175 votes = 22.24%
- Gravel = 3 votes = 0.38%
- Kucinich = 22 votes = 2.80%
- Obama = 278 votes = 35.32%
- Richardson = 41 votes = 5.21%
- Other = 16 votes = 2.03%


Sandown - 1,002 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 451 votes = 45.01%

- Edwards = 182 votes = 18.16%
- Gravel = 3 votes = 0.30%
- Kucinich = 8 votes = 0.80%
- Obama = 300 votes = 29.94%
- Richardson = 41 votes = 4.09%
- Other = 17 votes = 1.70%


Sandwich - 461 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 120 votes = 26.03%

- Edwards = 86 votes = 18.66%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 9 votes = 1.95%
- Obama = 211 votes = 45.77%
- Richardson = 31 votes = 6.72%
- Other = 4 votes = 0.87%


Seabrook - 1,467 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 845 votes = 57.60%

- Edwards = 235 votes = 16.02%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 7 votes = 0.48%
- Obama = 330 votes = 22.49%
- Richardson = 42 votes = 2.86%
- Other = 8 votes = 0.55%


Sharon - 135 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 33 votes = 24.44%

- Edwards = 19 votes = 14.07%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 0.74%
- Obama = 80 votes = 59.26%
- Richardson = 2 votes = 1.48%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Shelburne - 107 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 43 votes = 40.19%
- Edwards = 15 votes = 14.02%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 3 votes = 2.80%
- Obama = 39 votes = 36.45%
- Richardson = 7 votes = 6.54%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%

Somersworth - 2,660 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1249 votes = 46.95%

- Edwards = 492 votes = 18.50%
- Gravel = 3 votes = 0.11%
- Kucinich = 32 votes = 1.20%
- Obama = 767 votes = 28.83%
- Richardson = 79 votes = 2.97%
- Other = 38 votes = 1.43%


South Hampton - 214 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 107 votes = 50.00%
- Edwards = 34 votes = 15.89%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 8 votes = 3.74%
- Obama = 55 votes = 25.70%
- Richardson = 6 votes = 2.80%
- Other = 4 votes = 1.87%

Springfield - 279 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 86 votes = 30.82%

- Edwards = 32 votes = 11.47%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 3 votes = 1.08%
- Obama = 143 votes = 51.25%
- Richardson = 14 votes = 5.02%
- Other = 1 votes = 0.36%


Stark - 135 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 42 votes = 31.11%
- Edwards = 49 votes = 36.30%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.74%
- Kucinich = 1 votes = 0.74%
- Obama = 34 votes = 25.19%
- Richardson = 4 votes = 2.96%
- Other = 4 votes = 2.96%

Stewartstown - 141 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 73 votes = 51.77%
- Edwards = 11 votes = 7.80%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 1.42%
- Obama = 48 votes = 34.04%
- Richardson = 4 votes = 2.84%
- Other = 3 votes = 2.13%

Stoddard - 306 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 91 votes = 29.74%

- Edwards = 66 votes = 21.57%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 12 votes = 3.92%
- Obama = 105 votes = 34.31%
- Richardson = 29 votes = 9.48%
- Other = 3 votes = 0.98%


Strafford - 944 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 349 votes = 36.97%
- Edwards = 207 votes = 21.93%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.21%
- Kucinich = 23 votes = 2.44%
- Obama = 295 votes = 31.25%
- Richardson = 56 votes = 5.93%
- Other = 12 votes = 1.27%

Stratford - 128 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 61 votes = 47.66%
- Edwards = 25 votes = 19.53%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 34 votes = 26.56%
- Richardson = 6 votes = 4.69%
- Other = 2 votes = 1.56%

Stratham - 1,853 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 674 votes = 36.37%
- Edwards = 282 votes = 15.22%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.11%
- Kucinich = 16 votes = 0.86%
- Obama = 802 votes = 43.28%
- Richardson = 74 votes = 3.99%
- Other = 3 votes = 0.16%


Sugar Hill - 211 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 62 votes = 29.38%

- Edwards = 30 votes = 14.22%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.95%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 0.95%
- Obama = 104 votes = 49.29%
- Richardson = 11 votes = 5.21%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Sullivan - 204 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 74 votes = 36.27%
- Edwards = 42 votes = 20.59%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.49%
- Kucinich = 5 votes = 2.45%
- Obama = 71 votes = 34.80%
- Richardson = 10 votes = 4.90%
- Other = 1 votes = 0.49%

Sunapee - 829 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 252 votes = 30.40%
- Edwards = 162 votes = 19.54%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.12%
- Kucinich = 7 votes = 0.84%
- Obama = 348 votes = 41.98%
- Richardson = 54 votes = 6.51%
- Other = 5 votes = 0.60%


Surry - 228 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 69 votes = 30.26%

- Edwards = 47 votes = 20.61%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 4 votes = 1.75%
- Obama = 90 votes = 39.47%
- Richardson = 15 votes = 6.58%
- Other = 3 votes = 1.32%


Sutton - 546 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 154 votes = 28.21%

- Edwards = 87 votes = 15.93%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 16 votes = 2.93%
- Obama = 250 votes = 45.79%
- Richardson = 36 votes = 6.59%
- Other = 3 votes = 0.55%


Swanzey - 1,582 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 603 votes = 38.12%

- Edwards = 276 votes = 17.45%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.06%
- Kucinich = 24 votes = 1.52%
- Obama = 553 votes = 34.96%
- Richardson = 100 votes = 6.32%
- Other = 25 votes = 1.58%


Tamworth - 643 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 184 votes = 28.62%

- Edwards = 121 votes = 18.82%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.16%
- Kucinich = 11 votes = 1.71%
- Obama = 269 votes = 41.84%
- Richardson = 53 votes = 8.24%
- Other = 4 votes = 0.62%


Temple - 0 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
NO VOTES
Thornton - 561 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 217 votes = 38.68%
- Edwards = 90 votes = 16.04%
- Gravel = 4 votes = 0.71%
- Kucinich = 7 votes = 1.25%
- Obama = 202 votes = 36.01%
- Richardson = 34 votes = 6.06%
- Other = 7 votes = 1.25%

Tilton - 770 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 281 votes = 36.49%
- Edwards = 164 votes = 21.30%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 0.26%
- Obama = 282 votes = 36.62%
- Richardson = 25 votes = 3.25%
- Other = 16 votes = 2.08%


Troy - 467 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 215 votes = 46.04%
- Edwards = 63 votes = 13.49%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 14 votes = 3.00%
- Obama = 159 votes = 34.05%
- Richardson = 16 votes = 3.43%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%

Tuftonboro - 517 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 165 votes = 31.91%

- Edwards = 82 votes = 15.86%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.19%
- Kucinich = 7 votes = 1.35%
- Obama = 236 votes = 45.65%
- Richardson = 22 votes = 4.26%
- Other = 4 votes = 0.77%


Unity - 309 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 107 votes = 34.63%
- Edwards = 78 votes = 25.24%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 0.65%
- Obama = 107 votes = 34.63%
- Richardson = 15 votes = 4.85%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Wakefield - 803 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 363 votes = 45.21%

- Edwards = 158 votes = 19.68%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 7 votes = 0.87%
- Obama = 238 votes = 29.64%
- Richardson = 32 votes = 3.99%
- Other = 5 votes = 0.62%


Walpole - 1,052 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 319 votes = 30.32%

- Edwards = 151 votes = 14.35%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.19%
- Kucinich = 23 votes = 2.19%
- Obama = 489 votes = 46.48%
- Richardson = 57 votes = 5.42%
- Other = 11 votes = 1.05%


Warner - 788 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 238 votes = 30.20%

- Edwards = 178 votes = 22.59%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 16 votes = 2.03%
- Obama = 303 votes = 38.45%
- Richardson = 46 votes = 5.84%
- Other = 7 votes = 0.89%


Warren - 172 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 77 votes = 44.77%
- Edwards = 41 votes = 23.84%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 5 votes = 2.91%
- Obama = 39 votes = 22.67%
- Richardson = 9 votes = 5.23%
- Other = 1 votes = 0.58%

Washington - 193 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 58 votes = 30.05%

- Edwards = 41 votes = 21.24%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 4 votes = 2.07%
- Obama = 77 votes = 39.90%
- Richardson = 11 votes = 5.70%
- Other = 2 votes = 1.04%


Waterville - 99 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 33 votes = 33.33%

- Edwards = 5 votes = 5.05%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 2.02%
- Obama = 53 votes = 53.54%
- Richardson = 6 votes = 6.06%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Weare - 1,591 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 630 votes = 39.60%

- Edwards = 255 votes = 16.03%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.06%
- Kucinich = 21 votes = 1.32%
- Obama = 580 votes = 36.46%
- Richardson = 97 votes = 6.10%
- Other = 7 votes = 0.44%


Webster - 513 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 181 votes = 35.28%

- Edwards = 104 votes = 20.27%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.39%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 0.39%
- Obama = 191 votes = 37.23%
- Richardson = 33 votes = 6.43%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Wentworth - 161 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 65 votes = 40.37%
- Edwards = 31 votes = 19.25%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 3 votes = 1.86%
- Obama = 53 votes = 32.92%
- Richardson = 7 votes = 4.35%
- Other = 2 votes = 1.24%

Wentworth's Location - 4 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 1 votes = 25.00%

- Edwards = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Obama = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Richardson = 3 votes = 75.00%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Westmoreland - 515 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 128 votes = 24.85%

- Edwards = 114 votes = 22.14%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.19%
- Kucinich = 24 votes = 4.66%
- Obama = 213 votes = 41.36%
- Richardson = 33 votes = 6.41%
- Other = 2 votes = 0.39%


Whitefield - 417 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 155 votes = 37.17%
- Edwards = 89 votes = 21.34%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 7 votes = 1.68%
- Obama = 137 votes = 32.85%
- Richardson = 23 votes = 5.52%
- Other = 6 votes = 1.44%

Wilmot - 392 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 87 votes = 22.19%

- Edwards = 63 votes = 16.07%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 12 votes = 3.06%
- Obama = 207 votes = 52.81%
- Richardson = 23 votes = 5.87%
- Other = 0 votes = 0.00%


Wilton - 975 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 284 votes = 29.13%

- Edwards = 180 votes = 18.46%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.21%
- Kucinich = 39 votes = 4.00%
- Obama = 386 votes = 39.59%
- Richardson = 73 votes = 7.49%
- Other = 11 votes = 1.13%


Winchester - 826 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 403 votes = 48.79%

- Edwards = 116 votes = 14.04%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.24%
- Kucinich = 24 votes = 2.91%
- Obama = 236 votes = 28.57%
- Richardson = 26 votes = 3.15%
- Other = 19 votes = 2.30%


Windham - 2,439 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 1069 votes = 43.83%

- Edwards = 355 votes = 14.56%
- Gravel = 1 votes = 0.04%
- Kucinich = 19 votes = 0.78%
- Obama = 819 votes = 33.58%
- Richardson = 77 votes = 3.16%
- Other = 99 votes = 4.06%


Windsor - 0 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
NO VOTES
Wolfeboro - 1,510 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro
- Clinton = 517 votes = 34.24%
- Edwards = 250 votes = 16.56%
- Gravel = 2 votes = 0.13%
- Kucinich = 14 votes = 0.93%
- Obama = 640 votes = 42.38%
- Richardson = 60 votes = 3.97%
- Other = 27 votes = 1.79%


Woodstock - 289 votes
VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots
- Clinton = 112 votes = 38.75%

- Edwards = 39 votes = 13.49%
- Gravel = 0 votes = 0.00%
- Kucinich = 2 votes = 0.69%
- Obama = 115 votes = 39.79%
- Richardson = 15 votes = 5.19%
- Other = 6 votes = 2.08%


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notice the town in red, "Unity", showing the exact same number of votes for Hillary and Obama. Hmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!! :shock:

_________________
"We seek a free flow of information... we are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people."-John F. Kennedy, Feb. 26th, 1962.


Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:42 pm
Profile YIM WWW
GT Truther
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:46 am
Posts: 2830
Location: Miles from DC in rural PA
Post VOTE DIFFERENCE
Let me put it more bluntly:


Obama..................Average Vote Percentage BY MACHINE: 36.309%.......BY HAND: 38.617%

Hillary...................Average Vote Percentage BY MACHINE: 39.618% ......BY HAND: 34.908%


The difference, for Hillary, in Machine Vs. Hand: +4.709% (13,475 votes; this would be the number of votes stolen for Hillary)

The difference, for Obama, in Machine vs. Hand: --2.308% (-6,604 votes; this would be the number stolen from Obama)

Looking at the final numbers, compared to the tracking AND exit polls, these numbers seem AWFULLY CONVEEEEENIENT.

Sadly, all the pundits are still arguing what happened, but no-one wants to even bring up the DIEBOLD issue.

SO.......the final 'result' by machine was EXACTLY what was shown on TV. The results from hand-counted ballots was what the tracking and exit polls showed.

As Dan (er, a 'Raven') once said about Kerry: "The fix is in!" Now we see why he posted the picture of Kerry superimposed on Obama's picture.

_________________
"We seek a free flow of information... we are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people."-John F. Kennedy, Feb. 26th, 1962.


Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:45 pm
Profile YIM WWW
GT Truther
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 6:53 pm
Posts: 109
Location: usa
Post 
DonDep

Quote:
Not sure what the reference meant re "....one from column A" etc....

DIEBOLD. Where else does a candidate turn a 13-point deficit into a 2-point lead overnight?


It's just an old Buddy Hacket comedy routine...done with a hysterically funny imitation of a Chinese accent....

We've got nutters on the right and nutters on the left.

Re: Diebold, you sure nailed it....."The fix is in". Between the virtual news black-out of Ron Paul....EXCEPT to sling dirt and this vote count...

The reference to the Cass site was a poke in the ribs of Shrub, the ultimate psycopath. There's some articles there that fit him to a tee.

Sheeesh


Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:55 pm
Profile
GT Truther
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:24 am
Posts: 2179
Location: Los Altos California
Post blowing in the wind
Uncle John here: I could calculate the odds that the election would come out this way, but it would make me cry.

It is sad to live in a country where votes are routinely rigged.

I'm proud of Dondep. May blessings be bestowed upon him.

I know that no one accepts my explanation of ET mind control as the reason behind this. They can control almost everyone's mind to think as they wish.

Free will? What a joke.

God watches and waits. In eternity this will be balanced out.

The beings that had a hand in rigging these votes will know the taste of fire, pain and remorse even though they might have mistakenly thought they were doing the "right" thing. I'll be waiting for them at the pearly gates. This includes d&m.


Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:40 pm
Profile WWW
Truth Seeker

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:31 pm
Posts: 27
Location: San Francisco
Post 
Quote:
Obama..................Average Vote Percentage BY MACHINE: 36.309%.......BY HAND: 38.617%

Hillary...................Average Vote Percentage BY MACHINE: 39.618% ......BY HAND: 34.908%


You could be right about vote rigging, Dondep. But there is another explantion that I find more likely. Namely that the geographic breakdown of the counties that went for Obama tended to be the poorer, more liberal counties on the western side of the state compared to the more well-off counties (particularly in the southeast) that are comprised of a lot of suburban communities of people working in higher paying jobs in MA and commuting to home in NH.

If you consider that relatively more well-off counties are likely to be able to afford an electoral infrastrucure that utilizes vote counting machines and that those same areas tend to be more likely to be Hillary voters, then what you have found is likely a coincidence. In the language of statistics, if you control for the variables of income and geography, there probably is no evidence to support your hypothesis.


Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:03 pm
Profile
GT Truther

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:08 pm
Posts: 5708
Post 
Quote:
Dr. William Deagle


The Astro-Physical Lectures of
Dr. William R. Deagle
by Wes Penre, September 03, 2007


At last somebody who has connected the dots. For you who already have researched the New World Order and the Illuminati for a long time, and feel that you still have a million questions (and who doesn't?), these videos are for you. These are the lectures, held on December 7th, 2006, of the amazing William Deagle (MD), whom will teach you how to ask the right questions to find the answers within yourself. These are the most breath-taking lectures I have ever heard; the knowledge and wisdom this man sits on is beyond anything I have encountered so far. He covers it all: 9/11, the portals in Iraq and Iran, which the Illuminati now are trying to open to let evil demonic entities through (thus the Iraq- and the upcoming Iran wars), who God is, how the Universe was created and our role in it, where we, as spiritual beings fit into the picture, and WHO THE ILLUMINATI REALLY ARE!
Dr. Deagle is a toxocologist who participated in classified projects on simulations of bioterror attacks with bioweapons in the late 1990s. He was an 'insider', whom received highly classified information, which he now has decided to come out in public with.

This is hours of watching and listening, but if you neglect these lectures because 'you don't have time', you will miss out on a lot of extremely important information you probably never will get elsewhere



Dr. William Deagle Part 1 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000045520


Dr. William Deagle Part 2 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000052761

Dr. William Deagle Part 3 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000052753

Dr. William of Deagle Part 4 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000052757

Dr. William Deagle Part 5 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000052749


Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:47 pm
Profile
GT Truther
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:46 am
Posts: 2830
Location: Miles from DC in rural PA
Post The 3,000-plus 'Hillary Anomalies'
Bunny-chan wrote:
Quote:
Obama..................Average Vote Percentage BY MACHINE: 36.309%.......BY HAND: 38.617%

Hillary...................Average Vote Percentage BY MACHINE: 39.618% ......BY HAND: 34.908%


You could be right about vote rigging, Dondep. But there is another explantion that I find more likely. Namely that the geographic breakdown of the counties that went for Obama tended to be the poorer, more liberal counties on the western side of the state compared to the more well-off counties (particularly in the southeast) that are comprised of a lot of suburban communities of people working in higher paying jobs in MA and commuting to home in NH.

If you consider that relatively more well-off counties are likely to be able to afford an electoral infrastrucure that utilizes vote counting machines and that those same areas tend to be more likely to be Hillary voters, then what you have found is likely a coincidence. In the language of statistics, if you control for the variables of income and geography, there probably is no evidence to support your hypothesis.


Actually, those considerations makes my point even more. The anomalous jurisdictions, in red above and including the main urban center of Manchester, are the ones that --- solely among ALL of the exit polling stations --- proved abruptly to be exceptions to the statistical sampling. ALL of the exit polling stations for the Republican balloting proved out. All the rest of the Democratic exit polling proved out, including the hand-counted ballots that gave Hillary the edge. Obama had an edge in "urban areas", as well as higher income and more advanced edcuation (according to the AP, CNN and NBC findings). In other words: For Hillary to defy the exit polls in certain jurisdictions, particularly ones more favorable to Obama, but comply with exit polling virtually everywhere else, and the Republican exit polling matched with ALL of the jurisdictions, it would lead many to believe that those machines (which can be tampered with quite easily, as has been proven) should show a receipt that all voters should be able to use to "re-vote" to validate a challenge or nullify one. In statistics the "Hillary Anomalies" are just wayyyy too convenient, coincidental and defying of the laws of sampling.

The only possible explanation OTHER than that would be the "Bradley Effect", which again isn't borne out in the New Hampshire demographic data, particularly in light of the Iowa results, in select machine-counted jurisdictions that just happen to have enough votes to bury the initial 3,000-point spread that held from the first 2% until the last 10% came in, which then added to the 3,000+ vote spread for good measure.

I should add that any self-respecting "election officer" for any given state should have arranged for the replacement of electronic voting machines (advanced electronic technology and higher cost isn't a measure of 'improved' and 'more transparent' balloting, but quite the opposite). Virginia has electro-mechanical machines that are much much more fraud-proof, but may be seen as so "20th-century"; that is, if one has no concern for security. Again; the electro-mechanical types are much much more fraud-proof, and the system Virginia uses is what New Hampshire supposedly had going in, whereby monitors from both parties - or candidate's camps - are allowed to be present for the official vote count.

_________________
"We seek a free flow of information... we are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people."-John F. Kennedy, Feb. 26th, 1962.


Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:57 pm
Profile YIM WWW
GT Truther

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:08 pm
Posts: 5708
Post 
Fantastic research Don on the election vote and uncovering the rigging.


All I have to say is to repeat that famous quote of J Stalin "He who casts the vote decided nothing. He who counts the vote decides everything."


Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:25 am
Profile
GT Truther

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:08 pm
Posts: 5708
Post 
I read in the other forum where Dan Burisch stated for the public record that he and Marci McDowell are registered Republicans.

Figures right into my theory in progress that all those of the Black Ops Intelligence Community must be Republicans for they all tend to be heartless soulless bas*$&@$! To work for such agencies.

The only exception was Richard Doty who claimed his party as registered Democrat. When we chatted in a few emails a while back. I was shocked! Philosophically he's pretty liberal. :shock:


PS.. As for myself when I first registered to vote in 1986 it was the Democrat table I went to. In on-line political beliefs survey which I just took again. It puts me deep into the Socialist camp of the Left. :) Which surprises me for today I consider myself as Independent.

"Workers of the World Unite!" ;)


Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:34 am
Profile
GT Truther

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:08 pm
Posts: 5708
Post 
We've heard over and over how the elite are planning mass population reduction of the world in order to govern the sheep left?

Well in a fantastic series of stories on this. Which you can catalog as "Know your Enemy and how they think and operate" is the following:


Quote:
The Population Bomb

In 1968, Dr. Paul R. Ehrlich wrote a well publicized book entitled The Population Bomb. Ehrlich predicted widespread famine and disaster unless population growth was reduced to zero in America and throughout the world by compulsory methods if necessary.

Ehrlich is a Professor of Biology at Stanford University specializing in population biology. He has written many books and scientific papers related to overpopulation and has been well rewarded for his efforts in both the academic and environmental spheres.

The first article examines Paul Ehrlich's ideas regarding the need to reduce the American population including the use of sterilants in the water and food supply with an antidote carefully rationed by the government. The next article in this series examines Ehrlich's desires for the rest of the planet, especially the third world. It also looks at the issue of "optimum" world population size and who should get to decide what that optimum level will be. The third part in this series discusses the need for altering religion, sex education and the role of women in society. Part four examines in some detail the different organizations, foundations and individuals involved in population control. Finally, I compare the arguments for "population explosion" with that of "global warming" by directly comparing The Population Bomb (1968) to Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth (2006).

Part 1

http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.co ... merica.htm


Part 2

http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.co ... _World.htm

Part 3

http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.co ... cation.htm

Part 4

http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.co ... b_Help.htm

Part 5

http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.co ... ore_GW.htm


This series and a host of other MUST READ stories can be found at a great great TruthSeeker Site:

http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.com/




Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:37 am
Profile
GT Truther

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:08 pm
Posts: 5708
Post 
Quote:
Full Spectrum Information Warfare
Information Operation Roadmap Part 1

Brent Jessop - Knowledge Driven Revolution.com
November 5, 2007

When the US military refers to full spectrum domination, they truly mean full spectrum. Information operations or information warfare is a key part of the military battlespace. Recently, a document entitled Information Operation Roadmap was declassified by the Pentagon because of a Freedom of Information Act request by the National Security Archive at George Washington University. The document was described by the Council on Foreign Relations' website as:

"A 2003 Pentagon document previously classified as 'noforn' (not for release to foreign nationals, including allies), this report details the US military's information operations, including psychological operations, electronic warfare, and involvement in foreign journalism. The document was made public by the National Security Archive on January 26, 2006."

On Par with Air, Ground, Maritime and Special Operations

The importance of information warfare is clearly laid out in this document.

"Key assumptions. Information, always important in warfare, is now critical to military success and will only become more so in the foreseeable future. Three key assumptions underscore the growing importance of information:

- (U) Effectively communicating U.S. Government (USG) capabilities and intentions is an important means of combating the plans of our adversaries. The ability to rapidly disseminate persuasive information to diverse audiences in order to directly influence their decision-making is an increasingly powerful means of deterring aggression." [emphasis mine] - 3

The major thrust of the document was that information operations should be centralized under the Office of the Secretary of Defence and made a core military competency.

"Objective: IO [information operations] becomes a core competency. The importance of dominating the information spectrum explains the objective of transforming IO into a core military competency on a par with air, ground, maritime and special operations. The charge to the IO Roadmap oversight panel was to develop as concrete a set of action recommendations as possible to make IO a core competency, which in turn required identifying the essential prerequisites to become a core military competency." [emphasis mine] - 4

Uniformity in Message and Themes

The major reason for centralizing the information operations under a single command was to create consistency between the various segments of the Pentagon's information operations.

"IO requires coordination with public affairs and civil military operations to complement the objectives of these related activities and ensure message consistency." [emphasis mine] - 23

"- (U) The USG [US Government] can not execute an effective communication strategy that facilitates military campaigns if various organs of Government disseminate inconsistent messages to foreign audiences. Therefore, it is important that policy differences between all USG Departments and Agencies be resolved to the extent that they shape themes and messages.

- (U) All DoD [Department of Defense] information activities, including information operations, which are conducted at the strategic, operational, and tactical level, should reflect and be consistent with broader national security policy and strategy objectives." [emphasis mine] - 25

"Coordinating information activities. Major DoD "information activities" include public affairs, military support to public diplomacy and PSYOP [psychological operations]. The State Department maintains the lead for public diplomacy, the [half line redacted] and the International Broadcasting Board of Governors maintains the lead for broadcasting USG messages overseas, often with DoD in a supporting role. DoD has consistently maintained that the information activities of all these agencies must be integrated and coordinated to ensure the promulgation of consistent themes and messages." [emphasis mine] - 25

A Trained and Ready Career Force

With the ascension of information operations into a core military competency the document recommended, under the heading "A Trained and Ready Career Force" that the:

"DoD [Department of Defence] requires a cadre of IO professionals capable of planning and executing fully integrated IO in support of Combatant Commanders. An IO career force should be afforded promotion and advancement opportunities commensurate with other warfighting areas and provided opportunities for advancement to senior executive or flag level rank." - 32

Support

The forward of this document was signed by then Secretary of Defence Donald H. Rumsfeld which contained the following statement of support:

"I approve the Roadmap recommendations and direct the Services, Combatant Commands and DoD Agencies to fully support implementation of this plan." - iv

What Are Information Operations?

This document defined information operations as follows:

"The integrated employment of the core capabilities of Electronic Warfare, Computer Network Operations, Psychological Operations, Military Deception and Operations Security, in concert with specified supporting and related capabilities, to influence, disrupt, corrupt or usurp adversarial human and automated decisions-making while protecting our own." - 22

The following series of articles will examine the Pentagon's intention of gaining full spectrum dominance in information warfare. Including, dominating the electro-magnetic spectrum and fighting the internet. Also, I will expand on the use of psychological operations or PSYOP as defined by the Information Operation Roadmap and if any limits exist in information warfare.

Related Articles


Part 2 "Maxium Control of Entire Electro-Magnet Spectrum

http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.co ... R_2_EW.htm

Part 3 "We Must Fight the Net"

http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.co ... ht_Net.htm


Part 5 "Information Warfare Without Limits"

http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.co ... _PSYOP.htm

Part 4 Information Warfare Using Agressive Psychological Operations

http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.co ... Limits.htm


This any many more MUST READ stories can be found at a great TRUTHSEEKER Site below:

http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.com





Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:49 am
Profile
GT Truther
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:00 pm
Posts: 636
Location: DC
Post 
Wes used to run the site illuminati news...
is it still up on the net?

Shady Groves wrote:
Quote:
Dr. William Deagle


The Astro-Physical Lectures of
Dr. William R. Deagle
by Wes Penre, September 03, 2007


At last somebody who has connected the dots. For you who already have researched the New World Order and the Illuminati for a long time, and feel that you still have a million questions (and who doesn't?), these videos are for you. These are the lectures, held on December 7th, 2006, of the amazing William Deagle (MD), whom will teach you how to ask the right questions to find the answers within yourself. These are the most breath-taking lectures I have ever heard; the knowledge and wisdom this man sits on is beyond anything I have encountered so far. He covers it all: 9/11, the portals in Iraq and Iran, which the Illuminati now are trying to open to let evil demonic entities through (thus the Iraq- and the upcoming Iran wars), who God is, how the Universe was created and our role in it, where we, as spiritual beings fit into the picture, and WHO THE ILLUMINATI REALLY ARE!
Dr. Deagle is a toxocologist who participated in classified projects on simulations of bioterror attacks with bioweapons in the late 1990s. He was an 'insider', whom received highly classified information, which he now has decided to come out in public with.

This is hours of watching and listening, but if you neglect these lectures because 'you don't have time', you will miss out on a lot of extremely important information you probably never will get elsewhere



Dr. William Deagle Part 1 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000045520


Dr. William Deagle Part 2 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000052761

Dr. William Deagle Part 3 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000052753

Dr. William of Deagle Part 4 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000052757

Dr. William Deagle Part 5 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000052749


Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:33 am
Profile
GT Truther

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:08 pm
Posts: 5708
Post 
Thats were I just clipped this piece it was still up and running just a few hours ago.

Shady


starryeyes wrote:
Wes used to run the site illuminati news...
is it still up on the net?

Shady Groves wrote:
Quote:
Dr. William Deagle


The Astro-Physical Lectures of
Dr. William R. Deagle
by Wes Penre, September 03, 2007


At last somebody who has connected the dots. For you who already have researched the New World Order and the Illuminati for a long time, and feel that you still have a million questions (and who doesn't?), these videos are for you. These are the lectures, held on December 7th, 2006, of the amazing William Deagle (MD), whom will teach you how to ask the right questions to find the answers within yourself. These are the most breath-taking lectures I have ever heard; the knowledge and wisdom this man sits on is beyond anything I have encountered so far. He covers it all: 9/11, the portals in Iraq and Iran, which the Illuminati now are trying to open to let evil demonic entities through (thus the Iraq- and the upcoming Iran wars), who God is, how the Universe was created and our role in it, where we, as spiritual beings fit into the picture, and WHO THE ILLUMINATI REALLY ARE!
Dr. Deagle is a toxocologist who participated in classified projects on simulations of bioterror attacks with bioweapons in the late 1990s. He was an 'insider', whom received highly classified information, which he now has decided to come out in public with.

This is hours of watching and listening, but if you neglect these lectures because 'you don't have time', you will miss out on a lot of extremely important information you probably never will get elsewhere



Dr. William Deagle Part 1 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000045520


Dr. William Deagle Part 2 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000052761

Dr. William Deagle Part 3 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000052753

Dr. William of Deagle Part 4 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000052757

Dr. William Deagle Part 5 of 5

http://www.guba.com/watch/3000052749


Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:50 am
Profile
GT Truther

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:08 pm
Posts: 5708
Post 
RFID Tags now employed in major hospitals to protect new borns of supposed baby snatchers..


How soon will it be before Big Brother says, Well baby ankle bracelets don't work.. Here let us INJECT your child with tag. If your baby is ever taken we can use our global positioning systems to track your baby any place in the world. We will protect your precious new born from all harm 24/365 and its a FREE service from Good ol'Uncle Satan... Oppsy Uncle Sam.. Uncle Sam.

I can hear the conversation right now.

Hospital Official: Here lets inject little Johnny/Jane for you Mrs Jane Doe. Its a simple procedure and entirely painless.

Mrs Jane: Well... that seems a little drastic my child will be safe with just the ankle bracelet I'm sure.

HO: But ma'am what about all these baby snatching s why just look at these reports from across the country. There everywhere. Don't you want the absolute protection our system offers? Don't you love your child to assure their other safety with our system..


Mrs Jane: "Well isn't that a bit drastic and an invasion of privacy? No... I'll just keep the ankle bracelet for his/her stay here at the hospital.

Mrs Jane gets up and leaves while the Hospital Official picks up the phone and reports her to Homeland Security, Child Protection Divisions.

Click..."Homeland Security How can We help you."

"Yes I'm with St John's Hospital here in Middle America I'd like to report a case of child neglect."



Its coming Folks and coming soon! If you don't believe me.. YOUR NUTS! Awake Up!


Shady











Quote:
http://parallelnormal.com/2008/01/04/invasion-of-the-baby-snatchers/

Invasion of the Baby Snatchers!
Posted on January 4, 2008 by Mark Baard

Image

Where there is no threat, and no market, create one.
Got to start ‘em young. Now proud parents can tell their children how RFID kept them safe from evil.
Verichip is again boasting it is saving babies from the (incredibly small) threat posed by baby snatchers in hospitals, and from mom-baby mismatches.
Verichip is best known for its subcutaneous RFID transponder, which some suspect of causing cancer in laboratory animals.

But the Delray Beach-based company also owns Ottawa-based Xmark, whose Hugs RFID ankle bracelets are now being used in more than half of Ohio’s “birthing facilities.”
The Hugs ankle bracelet will make your newborn look more like a parolee then any dumb, printed tag ever could.
If the ankle bracelt loses contact with the baby’s skin, or the device tampered with, an alarm sounds. (Better warn grandpa, as he might be tempted to tickle the kid’s feet.) Alerts also go out to security personnel. Ditto for any perimeter violations, or unauthorized exits.

The Hugs system can also roll the CCTV cameras near a site where a violation has occurred.

The other major part of the Hugs system is an optional RFID-pairing wrist device for moms, called Kisses.
clipped from www.morerfid.com

If a newborn is removed from the ward, if the tag is lifted from the baby’s skin or if the ankle strap is compromised, the system immediately triggers an alarm, alerting hospital security to the situation.
Xmark infant protection systems also protect against mismatching events by affixing matching RFID tags to mother and child. If the mother is given the wrong child, the RFID tag detects the mismatch and activates an audible alarm.


Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:53 am
Profile
GT Truther
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:38 pm
Posts: 3178
Location: "Consulting the Oracles"
Post 
A 'Prediction'

I don't know what this means, but, I'll tell it anyway...

"The Light of the Second Sun (Son) will be seen in a few weeks time."

Dex

Edit by Admin

Image

New 3.9 thread started


Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:29 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 768 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 27, 28, 29, 30, 31


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forums/DivisionCore.