Last night's State of the Union speech, Obama's speech, a Great leadership speech and to the point. I enjoyed it.
Boy! do I have my suspicions with who was involved with that Supreme court passage. I'm beginning to see the Republican as an corporate engaging lobby or they are the corporate, whereas versus the Democrat wishing to sever corporate and foreign entity control. What a division...Hmm

And add in..right now I'm looking at CNN and it's caption reads Pres. Obama says..everybody should be for everyone and America...nice to see support for my comments. Seriously, imperative we collectively attempt this change in us.
A further note from a contactee..some of us can be retrieved right now, out of the world, if we wanted too. People are being lifted out because their gift is they don't have to enter the graveyard this time around. I hope you believe me...?
These are the communications I receive. Wish I could tell you more.

Dex

4 days ago, on my birthday this photo of a pillow I believe materialized as a gift for me to find on the side of a road near where I live in the desert.
Looks like an image for a crop circle?
Wonder what their message could be?

Dex

Another Aquarius! Happy Birthday Dex!

The message is look to the sun, the moon, Saturn and other stars for answers.

Perhaps you should put it in your pillowcase and see what you dream after you fall asleep ---asking for the message to come into your wakeful consciousness. I'm excited at the thought! I bet you get a dream!!

I would let Dan and Marcia, seeing how they insist, have the golden thread and it would be interesting should we change this forum's name to the

"Silver Thread Forum" that lives..named in honor of the silver thread that connects us with the inner Heavens and our physical world until death. A more meaningful name.

Dex

Dex wrote:

"Thank you Simmering Frog.
Much appreciated

Dex:"

Re: Video showing earth-sized objects moving about in the Sun's Corona.

Does anyone have any ideas about what the objects are, who put them there, and what is the intent.

My first thought is that they are there to manage the Sun's activity, possible to prevent a MCE from frying us.

I have a question for the forum members...

If that sphere is possibly many times larger than our world...wouldn't that qualify it's description as a possible planetary size object X? X meaning an unknown?

Assuming this is real, then if a sphere that large were to move closer to our world would it not devastatingly be disruptive to our gravitational field?
I think now ridiculing the planet X concept warrants' a reconsideration and even an apology from the Eagle's Team for refusing to acknowledge the notion of such alleged reality.
How much more needs laid out on their lap.
It's obviously a real object and of very large proportions, so, proof came with the pudding.
Anything more coming out debunking the notion I believe is an attempt to misdirect or is a flat out denial example from a closed mind.

Dex

So what is their purpose in being so close to the sun?

Also, don't you think one or two would be big enough for Eras's population?

Dex, you might be right when you say the objects seen in the Sun's corona might have a purpose, which is "They'll be used for transporting a portion of humanity when the time comes."

I just finished reading various posts on other sites involving the so-called Kuiper Belt Aliens, and some think they will play a similar role.

But no matter what turns out to be true, I would be very reluctant to accept a ticket on the ET avoid-global catastrophe flight for three reasons.

The first reason is I don't feel like leaving the neighbourhood I live in. I have a sense of loyalty to my little part of the world, and a sense of loyalty to the people in this neighbourhood, such as the old lady that lives alone next door to me.

The second reason I won't get on board the escape craft is I don't trust the ET types. I mean, now that I've read that the human-looking Nordics are not to be trusted, I'm just not willing to trust any of the ET species. They will have to earn my trust, but then I guess there might not be time for them to do this.

The third reason is I have a rather fat cat that under no circumstance will I desert. I know it sounds strange that I would choose to not avoid a deathly coastal tsunami just because of my cat, but that is the truth.

The NAME GAME Explained

Recent research here in Canada shows that the income tax, and all other statutory law, is imposed based upon the 'property right', and that property right is the property right of the corporate Crown in Canada, and corporate State (be it a State or the UNITED STATES) in the USA.
The same scheme can be found in any country that is a subject country of the Pontiff of Rome's Holy Roman Empire. Thus, in actuality, the assumed 'property right' is that of the corporate Holy Roman Empire, as the Crown or incorporated State is an agency for the Holy Roman Empire.

The ‘Crown’ is the administrative corporation of the Pontiff of Rome owned City of London,
the financial, legal and professional standards capitol of/for the Vatican, The City of London is
a square mile area within Greater London, England, and is an independent city-state.
In the USA, the administrative corporation for the Pontiff of Rome is the UNITED STATES,
and that corporation administers the Vatican capitol, for, primarily, military purposes, called Columbia, or the District of Columbia. The UNITED STATES also administers the 50 sub-corporate States of the United States of America, identified with the 2 cap letters – CA, OR, WA, etc.

All adult humans are deceived into using the fiction name, as imprinted on the copy of the birth certificate you receive when ordering it from Provincial/State Vital Statistics, or to whatever
source you apply. Although the birth certificate is of somewhat recent origin and used to formally offer 'citizens' as chattel in bankruptcy to the Pope's Holy Roman Empire owned Rothschilds' Banking System, the false use of the family name goes back into the Middle Ages in England. Thus, it is with the family name made a primary, or surname, (example - Mister Jones), and the given names of the child (example - Peter) made a reference name to the primary name. This is the reverse or mirror image to reality. A 'family name' is NOT a man's name - it is a name of a clan - a blood relationship. [Replace the example names with your given and family name.]

We are then 'forced' or 'obliged' to use that name in all commercial and Government dealings and communications. So, when we do use it, as 99.99% of the human inhabitants of North America (and most of the world) do, we supposedly 'voluntarily' attach ourselves, the free will adult human, to the Crown/State owned property, called the 'legal identity name' as an accessory attached to property owned by Another party..

The State or Crown does not give us authority, grant, license, permission or leave to use the Crown or State owned legal identity name. Thus, our use of it as an adult free will man (male or female) is a form of 'theft' against a maritime jurisdiction entity (all incorporated bodies are 'make-believe ships at sea'. In maritime law, the accused is guilty until proven innocent. This
allows the Roman Law system we have to impose 'involuntary servitude' upon an adult man.
We see this Roman Law within the US 13th Amendment (#2) instituted in the mid 1860's:
"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted," The crime with which you have been convicted is 'unauthorized use' of the State's or Crown's intellectual property - the legal identity name.

The Crown/State then invokes the legal maxim, accessio cedit principali, [an accessory attached to a principal becomes the property of the owner of the principal], where the principal is the legal identity name as 'intellectual property', the owner is the corporation called the Crown/State or UNITED STATES, and the accessory is the free will human who has supposedly volunteered himself to be 'property by attachment' of the Crown/State. An adult human who is property is, and by any other name, a 'slave', be it citizen, subject or freeman.

I would point out here that all concepts that teach that the relationship between free will man and Government/corporate bodies is contractual are incorrect. All supposed remedies in contract law, American UCC or Canadian PPSA are ‘red herring’ diversions – some intended, and some in ignorance by the teachers.

As a slave, one's property in possession, including body and labor, belongs to the slave owner 100%. And, the property right is a bundle of rights - own, use, sell, gift, bequeath and hypothecate property.

Thus, ALL 'income' resulting from the owned human slave's mental and/or physical labor belongs to the slave owner. That which is left with or granted to the slave for his own use
and maintenance is called a 'benefit'. In Canada, the 'return of income' [the phrase itself tells the story] is called a T1 'tax and benefits package'. The T1 or 1040 is an accounting by the slave of his fruits of labor that belongs to the slave owner, and the prescribed 'benefits' that he may keep or have back from withholding. Thus, all income tax cases against the people', in reality, result from fraud, illegal concealment and theft by the accused slave of the slave owner's ‘property'.

Going back to an above paragraph, we find that the attachment of oneself to the Crown/State owned name is 'assumed to be voluntary', as the Crown/State has no valid right to impose
slavery upon adult humans against their will. And, constitutional prohibitions of slavery only encompasses ' involuntary servitude', not 'voluntary servitude'. Anyone working as an employee is in a contract of voluntary servitude - direction and time control by, and obedience and loyalty to the employer. Until we ‘assumed to be slaves' get our heads around this key to the lock that holds our chains of slavery around our necks and ankles, we will continue to attempt to swim with that 100 lb ball chained to our leg.

Another factor of the use of the Roman Law system is contained within the 1860's 13th Amendment to the US Constitution, the Constitution of the corporate UNITED STATES,
and not the 13th Amendment of the US Republic inserted around 1819. In the later 13th
amendment, it says: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." Notice that this applies only to the corporate body called the
UNITED STATES.

All corporate bodies are make-believe ships at sea, and are thus, internally, under maritime law. In maritime law, an accused is guilty unless proven innocent. Thus, a free will adult man who uses without authority the property of a corporate body is under maritime
jurisdiction. This makes a free will man who uses a corporate Crown or corporate State owned
legal identity name a 'convicted criminal, and thus subject to the imposition of slavery, involuntary servitude. You, as a child were Crown or State property by way of the birth registry, and thus, you could use Crown or State property, the legal identity name. When you became an
adult, as a vessel on the seal of life as a sovereign captain/free will mind, you no longer had
a right to use that Crown or State owned legal identity name.

Reports of unsuccessful attempts at paying government imposed debts using the Canadian Bills of Exchange Act or US UCC provisions of settling an account proved that there was no contract issue between a Canadian or American adult human and the Government as is commonly taught by some patriot gurus.Under contract, a 'bill' is a method of equalizing a contract - like value exchanged for like value. However, under the 'property right' of a slave owner in regard to property in the possession of an owned slave, a 'demand' for the property by the slave owner,
or the slave owner's agent (such as the IRS, or county tax collector, or for a court imposed fine),
is all that is necessary, without regard to due process of law. Remember, ALL that a slave
possesses belongs to the slave owner. I am NOT saying you ARE a slave. I just point out to
you that Government, and its employees, judges and officers SEE you as a SLAVE.
See sections 35 and 46 of the "Bills of Exchange Act of Canada" regarding eligibility for use
of the provisions of that Act. GOOGLE it. A bill can only be paid with money, and there is no money in Canada or the USA since the early 1930s. All that is left is a 'promissory note'.

Further, when any 'officer' of the corporate body, be it 'peace officer or police', all the way to
King or President choose to declare someone 'homo sacer' (meaning a man who has been stripped of his status of 'person' - that being an obedient corporate slave member of the corporate body politic) - he is stripped of the rights of due process of law, and can be fined, punished, tortured or killed without repercussion to the officer, or officer involved. This happens all the time in the world of the Holy Roman Empire.

This doctrine of 'homo sacer' is clearly presented in the US Fugitive Slave Act 1850, Section 6:

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/fugitive.htm

Quote:
"In no trial or hearing under this act shall the testimony of such alleged fugitive be admitted in evidence; and the certificates in this and the first [fourth] section mentioned, shall be conclusive of the right of the person or persons in whose favor granted, to remove such fugitive to the State or Territory from which he escaped, and shall prevent all molestation of such person or persons by any process issued by any court, judge, magistrate, or other person whomsoever. Unquote

Three major points here: 1. The accused disobedient slave cannot enter evidence in his own defense. Sound familiar? The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal and German 'Holocaust Denial' litigation courts declare that "truth is no defense". Judges constantly ignore offered defenses by Government accused defendants, especially in traffic and income tax issues. And, this may be
acceptable if the judge were to explain why he need do that, but almost 100% of the time, no
explanation is offered, and that is to hide the 'homo sacer' doctrine, and the fact that a slave is being tried for disobedience to the rules within the slave owner's property right.
2. The 'certificate' presented by the officer or agent of the property owner (declaration of property ownership) is sufficient for conviction of disobedience.
3. No molestation (such as criminal or civil complaints) can be made by, or on behalf of the accused or convicted disobedient slave. Anyone know of successful litigation against a police
officer or judge who severely abused the unalienable rights of a man? Yes, there may be a few
in well publicized cases, where the system has to hide their despotic Roman scheme, but that is rare.
I am not suggesting that the Fugitive Slave Act is still being used. It was likely rescinded at some time; however, what I do say is that the provisions written within that act were directly out of the Roman Law system in dealing with disobedient slaves, and it is Roman Law that is being imposed upon the free will adult people in America and Canada who have had Roman slavery imposed upon them.

A POSSIBLE REMEDY
However, since we are 'forced to', or 'obliged to' use the Crown/State owned legal identity name in all commercial and government dealings, services and communications, we can make a 'claim of right' under the Rule of Private Necessity – with the necessity being the means to sustain and maintain our life, as all food, shelter, clothing, means of travel and that which answers our need for happiness all has to be obtained or used in the realms of commerce. Briefly, commerce is all communications, contracts, and other interrelations and interactions with other parties, which includes government.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity_(tort)

This should counter the claim that we 'voluntarily' attach ourselves to Crown/State property.
Repeating - The Private Necessity is that we cannot do anything in relation to life, liberty, property or due process of law without using the Crown/State owned name, and thus we cannot sustain or maintain our lives without that fiction name.

The name separation is only a court tactic, as the legal identity name is always the one charged. The Government intent, of course, is to get to the adult man (m or f) attached to that name - the attached accessory - you. Otherwise you, and your children need to 'use' that legal identity name in all commerce (communication), and you do so under private necessity. So, only in court do you need to prove:
1. That you are a separate party from the named defendant.
2. That you only use the legal identity name, named as defendant, under private necessity to sustain and maintain your life, and that you are not voluntarily attached to it permanently as an accessory to Crown property.
3. That you have Her Majesty's permission to use that Crown owned legal name according to Vital Statistics Acts of the Canadian Provinces.
4. That the copy of the birth certificate held by myself has been surrendered to the Court, and I deny any fiduciary responsibility for that Crown property or the name thereon. [Should have been previously surrendered, along with the Canada affidavit, to a judge in chambers hearing.]
5. It all comes right down to this: 'Informed consent'. You do not have to consent to identified as being the name found on the birth certificate. "I do not authorize you to recognize me as being one and the same as the legal identity name you find on your documents. I do not consent to that."

Also, a Freedom Of Information Demand should be sent to the Minister, or Representative
requesting the authority, date, means and methods by which you, a free will man (m or f)
became a slave owned by the corporate Crown or State.

A process that has worked recently in Texas is the 'surrender' of the copy of the birth certificate one has in possession to a judge, or the judge assigned to a case where you, in the legal identity name, are the defendant, in an 'in chambers' hearing. Some call this 'surrender' of the defendant (the legal identity name) as being on the 'private side' using the Biblical method of settling disputes privately if possible.

This is preferred to 'surrendering it in court' as that is on the 'public side', and as a human presence in the court room, the assumption that you are an attachment to the legal identity
name has already been made. And being attached as an accessory to it, you become surety, guarantor and do 'represent' the legal identity name defendant.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Addendum 1 Name Game

I don't promote or use the Commercial Redemption system. I just suggest showing the 'authorities" that I, and the 'legal identity name' are not one and the same party. The Statement of Live Birth and the Birth Certificate can be used as proof of that, since, as a child, you had nothing to do with the registration of your birth, nor with the choice of names you were to be called as a child.
1. The Birth Certificate shows that it belongs to the State/Province where you were born, and thus, is the property of the State or Crown in right of the Province.
2. The name on that shows your family name to be the primary name of the 'legal identity name' - a 'surname', and the first and second names being referential to it. That is fiction. The family name is a clan name. It is not the name of an individual man (m or f).
3. The Statement of Birth shows that the first and second name is a gift (given names), and as such is a contract. An infant (under age 21) cannot be party to a contract. An acceptor of a gift must 'accept', and accept voluntarily. Thus, you have never 'accepted' the given names. There is no mechanism to do that in the Roman Law we are under. The Roman law only sees the legal identity name, a name that belongs to the corporate Roman Empire of the Pope.
4. An adult man is actually a mind inhabiting a physical human body. Only things can be named. A mind is a process, not a thing.

Thus, when a human becomes an adult, that is akin to the launching of a new ship. The adult mind is equivalent to the captain of a ship at sea. The captain is sovereign or supreme on his ship. The only way a captain of a ship can lose that sovereignty is by putting his ship 'in tow' voluntarily behind another ship. It is then that the tow ship captain gains sovereignty over the captain of the ship in tow.

The legal identity name is the rope that ties our vessel to the corporate Crown of the City of London (owned by the corporate Holy Roman Empire).

The Name Game Blog explains the rest.

Addendum 2 Name Game

The name "they" use on all their documents, including indictments, is the legal name. I believe there is no argument with that. In fact, the courts are usually ready to agree with that classification without hesitation.
By presenting the Statement of Birth (SOB) to them and asking them to do an investigation with a view to answering just two simple questions, will repel all attacks from the "system". The two questions are:
1. Who has secured the rights (legal and equitable) in the legal name??? (insert name exactly as it appears on the Birth Certificate even though the all caps aspect is a red herring); and,
2. What rights do I have in the legal name ???
The answers to these two questions will prove (in Ontario SOB's are admissible in any Ontario court as Proof, not just evidence, of the facts so certified) that
1. the government secured the rights (a.k.a. the secured party) in the legal name and, therefore, I have no rights in the legal name. 2. If I have no rights in the legal name, then how can I have any obligations related to the legal name?
The party that the law holds legally responsible for the financial and other obligations of the property (legal name) is the secured party, which is the government in the case of the legal name. This is all proven by the SOB!
It would seem to me that there is no place for the system to go once this truth is on the table. Certainly CRA can be easily defeated with this approach.
However, the judge may make the assumption that by your ‘permanent’ use of the legal identity name, you have become an accessory attached to that Crown owned name, and thus you are the property of the Crown by the legal maxim, which arises out of the property right, accessio cedit principali. Thus, to complete the above procedure, you must, by affidavit or notice, make a claim of right of free will status and claim that the Crown owned name is used under private necessity in commerce to sustain and maintain your life. As such, your use of the Crown owned name is not a voluntary act by yourself.
Some claim that Her Majesty, or the corporate Crown, has given one permission to use the Crown owned legal identity name. That assumption is arrived at by way of the Ontario 'Change of Names Act' which says: "Ch. C7; Person's name: 2.(1) For all purposes of Ontario law, (a) a person whose birth is registered in Ontario is entitled to be recognized by the name appearing on the person's birth certificate or change of name certificate". As it states, it only applies to 'persons' - which is the combination of the strawman name and the adult man, making that combined entity the 'property and subject of' the corporate Crown. That certainly is not the status we, as free will minded creatures, would wish to be.


Addendum 3 The Name Game
CONSENT

Regarding the use of the legal identity name, this thing comes down to consent. No means no and silence means yes.

We are all of the one individualized making you source energy flowing through a BC that is never not connected to the national treasury. In essence a BC is issued of the treasury so that all we do through the name on it flows to the/our treasury. However, that changes if you are recognized through a legal name.

The Birth Certificate is never un-connected from the treasury, 'For Treasury use only', just as you are never un-connected with the divine. You are the source, source energy, and in legal land, the treasury is source. The Statement Of Birth, as proof, is recognized by the government that it is so. Humans in this world are source energy. Source of commercial energy, to use that term, for without human, nothing happens. Just as in the bigger picture, without God nothing happens. So if you are searching for access to the treasury account look in mirror.

An old 'Law and Order' show. A woman was after the police to get a man who was stalking her. Again and again she went to the police to get this man to stop stalking her. Finally a detective says, "Mam, that man is not stalking you." "Oh yes he is" she says. "No Mam, he is not. There is nothing in our law books about stalking. So, that man there is not stalking you." This is how law and legal authority work. If it is not on the books, then it does not exist. In the case of that show there was no such thing as a stalker or stalking.

Show me the law or authority upon which anyone may rely that authorizes any agent to recognize you through a legal name? There is no such authority WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT. How is consent obtained against you by the agents? By your silence. Anytime you are getting 'done by', and remain silent, you are capitulating (in agreement). We are entitled to be recognized THROUGH (by means through) the legal name on the BC, but we are also entitled to say "No. I do not consent to be recognized by the name". If as has been the case you make it clear that you do not consent to be recognized through the legal name and the other party ignores you, and you do not take an appropriate course of action to stop it, you are agreeing to get 'done by'.

So what we have going on here is a whole bunch of agents are recognizing us THROUGH a legal name, and we are not doing anything about it = silence. And, by = through.

WHEREAS [I like that word], if you know that there is no authority, legal, lawful or otherwise, for an agent to recognize you through a legal name, and you make it clear that you do not consent to be recognized through the name, that party is in the commission of a crime if he proceeds as if he has the authority because, in fact, there is no law that authorizes any agent to recognize you as anything or any capacity without your consent. No means no. Yes we must use a legal name, and yes, everything we do in that name is connected to the treasury, and the provinces /Canada, by holding the SOB's is in the loop as beneficiary/treasurer. But not if you are recognized through the legal name. By being recognized through the legal name, I say through because you are not the legal name, you are claiming ownership of property and the value of it; in essence, my stuff.

But if you do not consent to be recognized through the legal name, then the issuer of the BC is, and at that point is the owner of property and responsible for the debts, obligations, securities and undertakings of things you do through the legal name. The BC is always connected to the treasury (matrix), the question is, who the beneficiary is.
If you allow yourself to be recognized through the legal name then you are the beneficiary but if you do not consent then the treasury (Canada) is the beneficiary.

Where we have failed ourselves is when we do not address the I do not consent to be recognized through the name on the BC properly. It is your license to do as you please. The license of licenses. There is no law or legislation anywhere that authorizes any agent to recognize you through a legal name. There is nothing that prevents them from doing so or trying either. It is up to you how you react if one does. What I am saying is, no agent has the legal backing to recognize you through the legal name that will indemnify them from harm (prosecution) if they do after you made it clear that you do not consent. In other words, they have ruled over us purely because we did not say I DO NOT CONSENT TO BE RECOGNIZED THROUGH THE LEGAL IDENTITY NAME, OR BY ANY NAME; and there is no law that authorizes you to recognize me through a name without my consent.

Addendum 4 The Name Game Blog
Consent #2 March 09

When you present government ID and you do not want to be recognized through the name on it just say; I DO NOT AUTHORIZE YOU TO RECOGNIZE ME THROUGH THE NAME ON THIS ID.

There is no other source of such authority is what you need to get here. Your it.

Now everything we have learned over the years and in particular lately backs this I do not consent thing. A BC is not and was never intended to be personal identification it evolved as the deputy registrar said and it evolved through our giving consent to be recognized.

The Government holds title to the legal name and entitles you to be recognized through a legal name which it cannot do unless it has rights in the name. Significance of the government holding the SOB is proof. There is no proof that your parents gave you the name that appears on a SOB, impossible for that to be proven. Look up 'informed consent' at Wikipedia and you know now whats been going on.
"Informed consent is a legal condition whereby a person can be said to have given consent based upon a clear appreciation and understanding of the facts, implications and future consequences of an action. In order to give informed consent, the individual concerned must have adequate reasoning faculties and be in possession of all relevant facts at the time consent is given.

Impairment to reasoning and judgement which would make it impossible for someone to give informed consent include such factors as severe mental retardation, severe mental illness, intoxication, severe sleep deprivation, Alzheimer's disease, or being in a coma.
Some acts cannot legally take place because of a lack of informed consent. In cases where an individual is considered unable to give informed consent, another person is generally authorized to give consent on their behalf e.g. parents or legal guardians of a child and care-givers for the mentally ill.
However, if a severely injured person is brought to hospital in an unconscious state and no-one is available to give informed consent, doctors will give whatever treatment is necessary to save their life (according to the Hippocratic oath) which might involve major surgery e.g. amputation.
In cases where an individual is provided insufficient information to form a reasoned decision, serious ethical issues arise. Such cases in a clinical trial in medical research are anticipated and prevented by an ethics committee or Institutional Review Board."

Nolo.com legal definition:
An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives.

For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings . end quote

End of blog

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````


FOR DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE THIS INFORMATION TO LIBERATE YOURSELF, GO TO There are Instructions for IRS as well as CRA.

(Note: I'm sorry if this is off topic, but very informing about our obstacles' for Truth in every category...Dex)

Scientists broke the law by hiding climate change data: But legal loophole means they won't be prosecuted
By David Derbyshire
Last updated at 11:21 PM on 28th January 2010

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ptics.html

Accused: Professor Phil Jones asked a colleague to delete emails relating to a report by the IPCC

Scientist at the heart of the 'Climategate' email scandal broke the law when they refused to give raw data to the public, the privacy watchdog has ruled.

The Information Commissioner's office said University of East Anglia researchers breached the Freedom of Information Act when handling requests from climate change sceptics.

But the scientists will escape prosecution because the offences took place more than six months ago.

The revelation comes after a string of embarrassing blunders and gaffes for climate scientists and will fuel concerns that key researchers are too secretive and too arrogant.

It will pile pressure on the director of the university's climate change unit, Professor Phil Jones, who has stood aside while an investigation is carried out, and make it harder for him to return.

The ruling followed a complaint from retired engineer David Holland-66, whose Freedom of Information-requests were ignored.

Last night Mr Holland welcomed the watchdog's decision but said it was disappointing the researchers would not be prosecuted.

'All we are trying to do is make the scientists follow their own professional rules by being open, transparent and honest,' he said. 'We are not trying to show that human beings don't affect the climate, but to show that the science is not settled.'

Scientists at the University of East Anglia were encouraged to delete emails concerning claims that man-made emissions were causing global warming

The Climategate row broke in November when hundreds of stolen emails from the world-renowned Climate Research Unit in Norwich were posted online.

Top climate change adviser calls for honesty from scientists in global warming debate
Water vapour a 'major cause of global warming and cooling'

The emails appeared to show researchers discussing how to manipulate historical temperature data and dodge requests under the Freedom of Information Act.

One request came in 2008 from Mr Holland, a grandfather from Northampton and an engineering graduate. He was seeking evidence that scientists had cherry-picked research when preparing the previous year's UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report.

Conducting a full inquiry: Liberal Democrat MP Phil Willis

After the request was received, a message from one academic to another on May 28, 2008, said: 'Oh MAN! Will this c**p never end?' In other emails the researchers complained that the unit was being bombarded with FOI requests from sceptics. And in another, researchers appeared to be encouraging each other to delete emails.

After the emails were published, Mr Holland complained to the Information Commissioner's Office. An ICO spokesman yesterday confirmed that the UEA breached the Freedom of Information Act.


He added: 'The emails which are now public reveal that Mr Holland's requests under the Freedom of Information Act were not dealt with as they should have been under the legislation.'

Climate change sceptics welcomed the ruling and called for the Climategate inquiry to be made public. Lord Lawson, head of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, said it should also investigate whether the CRU denied opportunities to scientists trying to publish dissenting views.

Last week, the IPCC was forced to apologise after wrongly claiming the Himalayan glaciers could vanish within 25 years. Critics have also accused it of exaggerating the risk of tropical storms and hurricanes.

Earlier this week, Britain's chief scientific advisor, Professor John Beddington, called on climate scientists to be more honest about the uncertainties of global warming.

Way cool post Simmering Frog. I concur will all the information in this post. It sure brought back some memories. I came to a similar conclusion of consequences fifteen years ago albeit through various sources and study of many books. That is, as long as I work for and partake of the "system", my stuff will never be my own. I promptly resigned as an engineer on the up and started my own business. Then I bought a farm in the mountains once I had the necessary capital, and left. My business has city premises, but I manage it from my home. Now I make use of every loop hole and legal opportunity not to pay tax, or at least as little as I can. Before you try playing with the rules (the law) first know them. This was not to hard as I am subsisting as electronic publisher of the Law of my country.

We have become artists of self subsistence and independence from the system - as much as we can at least. In that way we feel we are doing our part - limiting the flow of "my" capital to the state. Our situation improves daily as systems are breaking down around us. So my decision personally was to resist the falseness of the system and to rather go onto a Spiritual journey. A decision which thrills me daily as I am at peace with myself. We now live by the Creators Law and only pay respect to man's law if we must. The ways of the world gets under my nails at times, but then nothing in this world is real if it is only a holographic projection of my held beliefs, which turns out to be gravitationally trapped light.

One thing not mentioned in this post was of "Paying Peter's Penance". The "cut" the holy see accepts every month from all nation states in the wold (is it not the famous 5%?) But that's a whole new story. Thanks for the post - a nice shot in the arm for me.

Hi Sky,

No pun.

It is good to hear from one who has enough background to appreciate the import of that material.

I have been trying to escape for almost 20 years, and it has cost me my business property and my home and what is worse is my creditability with my family and friends.

Recently, I was talking about the Roosevelt seizure of gold in '33, and my friends---having lots of higher education...laughed in my face. The programming about these matters is so deep that you appear insane if you lay out the truth.

The information on how to fill out the forms is facinating; I recommend a visit to the detaxcanada.org site.

"Quote:
* Wondering what those odd sphere-like features are in recent STEREO EUVI images?
Date – January 27, 2010

We have investigated, and determined that these are artifacts caused by an interaction between the high compression factors used for the beacon data, and cosmic ray events on the detector. Our discussion of image artifacts has been updated to include this phenomenon. Another factor which has contributed to this issue has been the recent delay in receiving the full resolution images from the spacecraft. This was caused by a server problem at the Deep Space Network, and has now been resolved."

BULLSHIT

Perfect spheres with shading? Moving? What a crock.